Question

1. How is the godel’s incompleteness theorem similar to tarskis undefinability of truth theorem? How is...

1. How is the godel’s incompleteness theorem similar to tarskis undefinability of truth theorem? How is it different?

2. What are they implying about math? Can we still trust math?

3. When is it better to use each theorem to prove something?

4. What is magical about them?

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. write a truth table using this symbol: --> 2. write the inputs for the truth...
1. write a truth table using this symbol: --> 2. write the inputs for the truth table to the left of the --> and write the outputs for the truth table to the right of the --> 3. write the compliment, or NOT using ' As an example: The truth table for AND is written this way: A B --> A AND B 0 0 --> 0 0 1 --> 0 1 0 --> 0 1 1 --> 1 or...
Create truth tables to prove whether each of the following is valid or invalid. You can...
Create truth tables to prove whether each of the following is valid or invalid. You can use Excel 1. (3 points) P v R ~R .: ~P 2. (4 points) (P & Q) => ~R R .: ~(P & Q) 3. (8 points) (P v Q) <=> (R & S) R S .: P v Q
1. Construct a truth table for: (¬p ∨ (p → ¬q)) → (¬p ∨ ¬q) 2....
1. Construct a truth table for: (¬p ∨ (p → ¬q)) → (¬p ∨ ¬q) 2. Give a proof using logical equivalences that (p → q) ∨ (q → r) and (p → r) are not logically equivalent. 3.Show using a truth table that (p → q) and (¬q → ¬p) are logically equivalent. 4. Use the rules of inference to prove that the premise p ∧ (p → ¬q) implies the conclusion ¬q. Number each step and give the...
What do you think of eac of these ideas? Do you agree or disagree for each...
What do you think of eac of these ideas? Do you agree or disagree for each one give the answer in full sentences 1. I do find his approach of deductive reasoning as a replacement of inductive reasoning a valid way to define scientific practice because the process is the process no matter if one is proving something right or wrong. I feel it can be applied to all branches and should be because as states in the reading it...
1. write a truth table using this symbol: --> 2. write the inputs for the truth...
1. write a truth table using this symbol: --> 2. write the inputs for the truth table to the left of the --> and write the outputs for the truth table to the right of the --> 3. write the compliment, or NOT using ' As an example: The truth table for AND is written this way: A B --> A AND B 0 0 --> 0 0 1 --> 0 1 0 --> 0 1 1 --> 1 or...
What would your response be to these two discussion board responses from students: 1. My definition...
What would your response be to these two discussion board responses from students: 1. My definition of knowledge is information that you acquire throughout your life that you can use for your benefit. Truth when talking about information is tricky because you need to do research in order to find out if something is truthful. that is where belief comes in to play. will you believe something to be true just because you saw a video on it? will you...
Appeal to Ignorance (argumentum ad ignoratiam) An appeal to ignorance proposes that we accept the truth...
Appeal to Ignorance (argumentum ad ignoratiam) An appeal to ignorance proposes that we accept the truth of a proposition unless an opponent can prove otherwise. Thus, for example: • No one has conclusively proven that there is no intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter. • Therefore, there is intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter. But, of course, the absence of evidence against a proposition is not enough to secure its truth. What we don't know could nevertheless be...
The following are attempts to define a binary operation on a set, are they actually binary...
The following are attempts to define a binary operation on a set, are they actually binary operations on the given set? If yes, prove it and if not please provide an explanation. 1) a*b = a-b on S, S is the set Z of integers. 2) a*b = a log b on S, S is the set R+ of positive real numbers 3) a*b = |a+b| on S, S is the set of Real numbers. what I want to know...
1. What is the Confucian opinion of contracts? _____ They are morally wrong. They are morally...
1. What is the Confucian opinion of contracts? _____ They are morally wrong. They are morally binding. They are useless and unnecessary. It is better to rely on a relationship of trust. 2. How is the Confucian notion of trust different from the usual Western one? ____ Confucians focus more on becoming trustworthy, not on trusting others. Confucians believe that betrayal is not important. Confucians do not expect others to be perfect. Confucians believe that trust can be regained after...
How is the chi-square independence test similar to the goodness-of-fit test? How is it different? What...
How is the chi-square independence test similar to the goodness-of-fit test? How is it different? What is the difference between McMemar’s Test and the Chi-squared test for 2 by 2 table. Question 2 A clinic administers two drugs to two groups of randomly assigned patients to cure the same disease: 70 patients received Drug 1 and 80 patients received Drug 2. The following table gives the information about the number of patients cured and the once not cured by each...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT