Question

Prove that if the relation R is symmetric, then its transitive closure, t(R)=R*, is also symmetric....

Prove that if the relation R is symmetric, then its transitive closure, t(R)=R*, is also symmetric. Please provide step by step solutions

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Determine whether the relation R on N is reflexive, symmetric, and/or transitive. Prove your answer. a)R...
Determine whether the relation R on N is reflexive, symmetric, and/or transitive. Prove your answer. a)R = {(x,y) : x,y ∈N,2|x,2|y}. b)R = {(x,y) : x,y ∈ A}. A = {1,2,3,4} c)R = {(x,y) : x,y ∈N,x is even ,y is odd }.
Disprove: The following relation R on set Q is either reflexive, symmetric, or transitive. Let t...
Disprove: The following relation R on set Q is either reflexive, symmetric, or transitive. Let t and z be elements of Q. then t R z if and only if t = (z+1) * n for some integer n.
Determine whether the relation R is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive [4 Marks] 22 The relation...
Determine whether the relation R is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive [4 Marks] 22 The relation R on Z where (?, ?) ∈ ? if ? = ? . The relation R on the set of all subsets of {1, 2, 3, 4} where SRT means S C T.
Consider the relation R= {(1,2),(2,2),(2,3),(3,1),(3,3)}. Is R transitive, not reflexive, symmetric or equivalence relation?
Consider the relation R= {(1,2),(2,2),(2,3),(3,1),(3,3)}. Is R transitive, not reflexive, symmetric or equivalence relation?
Prove that strong connectivity is reflexive, transitive and symmetric.
Prove that strong connectivity is reflexive, transitive and symmetric.
show that the relation "≈" is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive on the class of all sets.
show that the relation "≈" is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive on the class of all sets.
Prove or disprove: The relation "is-a-normal-subgroup-of" is a transitive relation.
Prove or disprove: The relation "is-a-normal-subgroup-of" is a transitive relation.
The subgroup relation ≤ on the set of subgroups G is reflexive, transitive, and anti-symmetric.
The subgroup relation ≤ on the set of subgroups G is reflexive, transitive, and anti-symmetric.
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
1) (a) Provide an example of a symmetric relation on the set S={1,2,3,4,5}S={1,2,3,4,5} that is not...
1) (a) Provide an example of a symmetric relation on the set S={1,2,3,4,5}S={1,2,3,4,5} that is not transitive. (b) Provide an example of a transitive relation on the set S={1,2,3,4,5}S={1,2,3,4,5} that is not symmetric.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT