Question

Suppose A is a subset of R (real numbers) sucks that both infA and supA exists....

Suppose A is a subset of R (real numbers) sucks that both infA and supA exists. Define -A={-a: a in A}.

Prive that:

A. inf(-A) and sup(-A) exist

B. inf(-A)= -supA and sup(-A)= -infA

NOTE:

supA=u defined by: (u is least upper bound of A) for all x in A, x <= u, AND if u' is an upper bound of A, then u <= u'

infA=v defined by: (v is greatest lower bound of A) for all y in A, v <= y, AND if v' is a lower bound of A, then v' <= v

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A. Let p and r be real numbers, with p < r. Using the axioms of...
A. Let p and r be real numbers, with p < r. Using the axioms of the real number system, prove there exists a real number q so that p < q < r. B. Let f: R→R be a polynomial function of even degree and let A={f(x)|x ∈R} be the range of f. Define f such that it has at least two terms. 1. Using the properties and definitions of the real number system, and in particular the definition...
Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers such that for each x ∈...
Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers such that for each x ∈ s and y ∈ T we have x<y. a) Prove that sup S and int T exist b) Let M = sup S and N= inf T. Prove that M<=N
Show that every nonempty subset of the real numbers with a lower bound has a greatest...
Show that every nonempty subset of the real numbers with a lower bound has a greatest lower bound.
Is there a set A ⊆ R with the following property? In each case give an...
Is there a set A ⊆ R with the following property? In each case give an example, or a rigorous proof that it does not exist. d) Every real number is both a lower and an upper bound for A. (e) A is non-empty and 2inf(A) < a < 1 sup(A) for every a ∈ A.2 (f) A is non-empty and (inf(A),sup(A)) ⊆ [a+ 1,b− 1] for some a,b ∈ A and n > 1000.
Using the completeness axiom, show that every nonempty set E of real numbers that is bounded...
Using the completeness axiom, show that every nonempty set E of real numbers that is bounded below has a greatest lower bound (i.e., inf E exists and is a real number).
Real Analysis I Prove the following exercises (show all your work)- Exercise 1.1.1: Prove part (iii)...
Real Analysis I Prove the following exercises (show all your work)- Exercise 1.1.1: Prove part (iii) of Proposition 1.1.8. That is, let F be an ordered field and x, y,z ∈ F. Prove If x < 0 and y < z, then xy > xz. Let F be an ordered field and x, y,z,w ∈ F. Then: If x < 0 and y < z, then xy > xz. Exercise 1.1.5: Let S be an ordered set. Let A ⊂...
Suppose A and B are nonempty sets of real numbers, and that for every x ∈...
Suppose A and B are nonempty sets of real numbers, and that for every x ∈ A, and every y ∈ B, we have x < y. Prove that A ≤ inf(B).
Suppose ? ⊂ R^? , ? ⊂ R^? are nonempty and open and ? : ?...
Suppose ? ⊂ R^? , ? ⊂ R^? are nonempty and open and ? : ? → R^? and ? : ? → R^? . Let ℎ : ? × ? → R ?+? be defined by ℎ(u, v) = (?(u), ?(v)). If ? is continuous at x ∈ ? and ? is continuous at y ∈ ? , then show that ℎ is continuous at (x, y) ∈ ? × ? . Hint: Note that for any vectors z...
Suppose S ⊂ R is nonempty and M is an upper bound for S. Show M...
Suppose S ⊂ R is nonempty and M is an upper bound for S. Show M = sup S if and only if for every Ɛ > 0, there exists x ∈ S so that x > M − Ɛ.
1. (a) Let S be a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above. Prove...
1. (a) Let S be a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above. Prove that if u and v are both least upper bounds of S, then u = v. (b) Let a > 0 be a real number. Define S := {1 − a n : n ∈ N}. Prove that if epsilon > 0, then there is an element x ∈ S such that x > 1−epsilon.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT