Question

Create truth tables to prove whether each of the following is valid or invalid. You can...

Create truth tables to prove whether each of the following is valid or invalid.

You can use Excel

1. (3 points)

P v R

~R

.: ~P

2. (4 points)

(P & Q) => ~R

R

.: ~(P & Q)

3. (8 points)

(P v Q) <=> (R & S)

R

S

.: P v Q

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Use the FULL truth-table method to determine whether the following argument form is valid or invalid....
Use the FULL truth-table method to determine whether the following argument form is valid or invalid. Show the complete table (with a column of ‘T’s and ‘F’s under every operator); state explicitly whether the argument form is valid or invalid; and clearly identify counterexample rows, if there are any. (p ⋅ q) ⊃ ~(q ∨ p), p ⊃ (p ⊃ q) /∴ q ≡ p Use the FULL truth-table method to determine whether the following argument form is valid or...
Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V), or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ∨...
Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V), or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ∨ (~q ∨ r) ~p ⊃ r ∴ q ∨ r Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V) or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ≡ q p ⊃ q ∴ ~p ● q
Use a truth table to determine whether the following argument is valid. p →q ∨ ∼r...
Use a truth table to determine whether the following argument is valid. p →q ∨ ∼r q → p ∧ r ∴ p →r
use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones...
use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones is convicted then he will go to prison. Jones will be convicted only if Smith testifies against him. Therefore , Jones won't go to prison unless smith testifies against him. b) either the Democrats or the Republicans will have a majority in the Senate. but not both. Having a Democratic majority is a necessary condition for the bill to pass. Therefore, if the republicans...
Construct a truth table to determine whether the following expression is a tautology, contradiction, or a...
Construct a truth table to determine whether the following expression is a tautology, contradiction, or a contingency. (r ʌ (p ® q)) ↔ (r ʌ ((r ® p) ® q)) Use the Laws of Logic to prove the following statement: r ʌ (p ® q) Û r ʌ ((r ® p) ® q) [Hint: Start from the RHS, and use substitution, De Morgan, distributive & idempotent] Based on (a) and/or (b), can the following statement be true? (p ® q)...
For three statements P, Q and R, use truth tables to verify the following. (a) (P...
For three statements P, Q and R, use truth tables to verify the following. (a) (P ⇒ Q) ∧ (P ⇒ R) ≡ P ⇒ (Q ∧ R). (c) (P ⇒ Q) ∨ (P ⇒ R) ≡ P ⇒ (Q ∨ R). (e) (P ⇒ Q) ∧ (Q ⇒ R) ≡ P ⇒ R.
Part IV: All of the following arguments are VALID. Prove the validity of each using NATURAL...
Part IV: All of the following arguments are VALID. Prove the validity of each using NATURAL DEDUCTION. 1) 1. H É I 2. U v ~I 3. ~U 4. H v S                                               / S 2) 1. (I × E) É (F É Y) 2. Y É ~C 3. I × E                                                 / F É ~C 3) 1. L v O 2. (F v C) É B 3. L É F 4. O É C                                              / B 4) 1. K ×...
Decide whether each of the following arguments are valid by first converting to a question of...
Decide whether each of the following arguments are valid by first converting to a question of satisfiability of clauses (see the Proposition), and then using the DPP (¬Qv S),¬(S ∧P),((P→Q)∧R),((¬P→R)→¬P),therefore¬(S→P)
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the conclusion is true as well. Create an equivalent definition that is the contrapositive of the definition above. 2.) Show that the following argument is valid without using a truth table. Instead, argue that the argument fulfills the equivalent definition for valid argument that you created in number (1) p→¬q r→(p∧q) ¬r
Block copy, and paste, the argument into the window below, and do a proof to prove...
Block copy, and paste, the argument into the window below, and do a proof to prove that the argument is valid. This question is worth 25 points.    1. r ⊃ ~q 2. p • r 3. x v q : . x
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT