Question

2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff...

2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff either a < c or both a = c and b ≤ d. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

3. Define a relation R on integers as follows: mRn iff m + n is even. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

4. Define a relation R as follows:

R = {(a, a),(b, b),(c, c),(d, d),(c, a),(a, d),(c, d),(b, c),(b, d),(b, a)}

Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

5. How many different partial ordering relations are there on the set {a, b, c}?

6. Which of the following relations are partial orderings? Which are total orderings? Which are well-orderings?

            a. The relation described in Problem 2

            b. The relation described in Problem 3

            c. The relation described in Problem 4

            d. The "less-than" relation on the integers

            e. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the integers

            f. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the natural numbers

            g. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the real numbers

            h. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the non-negative real numbers

            i. The relations in Problem 5

Homework Answers

Answer #1


12

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Define a relation on N x N by (a, b)R(c, d) iff ad=bc a. Show that...
Define a relation on N x N by (a, b)R(c, d) iff ad=bc a. Show that R is an equivalence relation. b. Find the equivalence class E(1, 2)
Let A={1,2,3,4,5,6} and let R be the relation on A defined by xRy iff x +...
Let A={1,2,3,4,5,6} and let R be the relation on A defined by xRy iff x + y is even and x is less than or equal to y. Determine if R is partial order.
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. For this relation R: Show that the equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq. you may use the following lemma: If p is prime...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. For this relation R: Prove that R is an equivalence relation. you may use the following lemma: If p is prime and p|mn, then p|m or p|n
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. I need to prove that: a) R is an equivalence relation. (which I have) b) The equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq I...
Let R be a relation on set RxR of ordered pairs of real numbers such that...
Let R be a relation on set RxR of ordered pairs of real numbers such that (a,b)R(c,d) if a+d=b+c. Prove that R is an equivalence relation and find equivalence class [(0,b)]R
Let R be the relation on the set of real numbers such that xRy if and...
Let R be the relation on the set of real numbers such that xRy if and only if x and y are real numbers that differ by less than 1, that is, |x − y| < 1. Which of the following pair or pairs can be used as a counterexample to show this relation is not an equivalence relation? A) (1, 1) B) (1, 1.8), (1.8, 3) C) (1, 1), (3, 3) D) (1, 1), (1, 1.5)
Suppose we have the following relation R with composite primary key {A,B} together with the set...
Suppose we have the following relation R with composite primary key {A,B} together with the set FD of functional dependencies: R(A,B,C,D,E,F,G). FD = { C -> G, E -> B, A -> D, AB -> C, AB -> D, AB -> E. AB -> F, AB -> G } Draw the initial dependency diagram using the above information. The relation from part a) is in first normal form. Using the techniques described in the lecture, convert it to 2NF by...
There is no equivalence relation R on set {a, b, c, d, e} such that R...
There is no equivalence relation R on set {a, b, c, d, e} such that R contains less than 5 ordered pairs (True or False)
Define H: R->R by the rule H(x) = x2, for all real numbers x. c) Is...
Define H: R->R by the rule H(x) = x2, for all real numbers x. c) Is H one-to-one correspondence? Explain b) Define K: Rnonneg->Rnonneg by the rule K(x) = x2, for all nonnegative real numbers x. Is K a one to one correspondence?