Question

Suppose S ⊂ R is nonempty and M is an upper bound for S. Show M...

Suppose S ⊂ R is nonempty and M is an upper bound for S. Show M = sup S if and
only if for every Ɛ > 0, there exists x ∈ S so that x > M − Ɛ.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers such that for each x ∈...
Suppose S and T are nonempty sets of real numbers such that for each x ∈ s and y ∈ T we have x<y. a) Prove that sup S and int T exist b) Let M = sup S and N= inf T. Prove that M<=N
Real Analysis I Prove the following exercises (show all your work)- Exercise 1.1.1: Prove part (iii)...
Real Analysis I Prove the following exercises (show all your work)- Exercise 1.1.1: Prove part (iii) of Proposition 1.1.8. That is, let F be an ordered field and x, y,z ∈ F. Prove If x < 0 and y < z, then xy > xz. Let F be an ordered field and x, y,z,w ∈ F. Then: If x < 0 and y < z, then xy > xz. Exercise 1.1.5: Let S be an ordered set. Let A ⊂...
Suppose A ⊆ R is nonempty and bounded above and β ∈ R. Let A +...
Suppose A ⊆ R is nonempty and bounded above and β ∈ R. Let A + β = {a + β : a ∈ A} Prove that A + β has a supremum and sup(A + β) = sup(A) + β.
Show that every nonempty subset of the real numbers with a lower bound has a greatest...
Show that every nonempty subset of the real numbers with a lower bound has a greatest lower bound.
Suppose A is a subset of R (real numbers) sucks that both infA and supA exists....
Suppose A is a subset of R (real numbers) sucks that both infA and supA exists. Define -A={-a: a in A}. Prive that: A. inf(-A) and sup(-A) exist B. inf(-A)= -supA and sup(-A)= -infA NOTE: supA=u defined by: (u is least upper bound of A) for all x in A, x <= u, AND if u' is an upper bound of A, then u <= u' infA=v defined by: (v is greatest lower bound of A) for all y in...
Suppose ? ⊂ R^? , ? ⊂ R^? are nonempty and open and ? : ?...
Suppose ? ⊂ R^? , ? ⊂ R^? are nonempty and open and ? : ? → R^? and ? : ? → R^? . Let ℎ : ? × ? → R ?+? be defined by ℎ(u, v) = (?(u), ?(v)). If ? is continuous at x ∈ ? and ? is continuous at y ∈ ? , then show that ℎ is continuous at (x, y) ∈ ? × ? . Hint: Note that for any vectors z...
Let S and T be nonempty subsets of R with the following property: s ≤ t...
Let S and T be nonempty subsets of R with the following property: s ≤ t for all s ∈ S and t ∈ T. (a) Show that S is bounded above and T is bounded below. (b) Prove supS ≤ inf T . (c) Given an example of such sets S and T where S ∩ T is nonempty. (d) Give an example of sets S and T where supS = infT and S ∩T is the empty set....
Using the completeness axiom, show that every nonempty set E of real numbers that is bounded...
Using the completeness axiom, show that every nonempty set E of real numbers that is bounded below has a greatest lower bound (i.e., inf E exists and is a real number).
Let A ={1-1/n | n is a natural number} Prove that 0 is a lower bound...
Let A ={1-1/n | n is a natural number} Prove that 0 is a lower bound and 1 is an upper bound:  Start by taking x in A.  Then x = 1-1/n for some natural number n.  Starting from the fact that 0 < 1/n < 1 do some algebra and arithmetic to get to 0 < 1-1/n <1. Prove that lub(A) = 1:  Suppose that r is another upper bound.  Then wts that r<= 1.  Suppose not.  Then r<1.  So 1-r>0....
Let S be a nonempty set in Rn, and its support function be σS = sup{...
Let S be a nonempty set in Rn, and its support function be σS = sup{ <x,z> : z ∈ S}. let conv(S) denote the convex hull of S. Show that σS (x)= σconv(S) (x), for all x ∈ Rn