Question

Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...

Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. For this relation R: Prove that R is an equivalence relation.

you may use the following lemma: If p is prime and p|mn, then p|m or p|n

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

if u have any questions please comment

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. For this relation R: Show that the equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq. you may use the following lemma: If p is prime...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. I need to prove that: a) R is an equivalence relation. (which I have) b) The equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq I...
Let X be finite set . Let R be the relation on P(X). A,B∈P(X) A R...
Let X be finite set . Let R be the relation on P(X). A,B∈P(X) A R B Iff |A|＝|B| prove R is an equivalence relation
Let p,q be prime numbers, not necessarily distinct. If a group G has order pq, prove...
Let p,q be prime numbers, not necessarily distinct. If a group G has order pq, prove that any proper subgroup (meaning a subgroup not equal to G itself) must be cyclic. Hint: what are the possible sizes of the subgroups?
2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff...
2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff either a < c or both a = c and b ≤ d. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements. 3. Define a relation R on integers as follows: mRn iff m + n is even. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is...
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z ,...
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z , aRb if and only if 4 | (a + 3b). (a) Prove that R is an equivalence relation. (b) Prove that for all integers a and b, aRb if and only if a ≡ b (mod 4)
1. Let p be any prime number. Let r be any integer such that 0 <...
1. Let p be any prime number. Let r be any integer such that 0 < r < p−1. Show that there exists a number q such that rq = 1(mod p) 2. Let p1 and p2 be two distinct prime numbers. Let r1 and r2 be such that 0 < r1 < p1 and 0 < r2 < p2. Show that there exists a number x such that x = r1(mod p1)andx = r2(mod p2). 8. Suppose we roll...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as follows: m ∼ n ⇐⇒ ∃k ∈ N* mn = k2 (a) Prove that ∼ is an equivalence relation. (b) Find the equivalence classes of 2, 4, and 6.
Let A = {−5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3} and define a relation...
Let A = {−5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3} and define a relation R on A as follows: For all (m, n) is in A, m R n ⇔ 5|(m2 − n2). It is a fact that R is an equivalence relation on A. Use set-roster notation to list the distinct equivalence classes of R. (Enter your answer as a comma-separated list of sets.) ____________
Consider the relation on the real numbers R. a ~ b if (a−b) ∈ Z. (Z...
Consider the relation on the real numbers R. a ~ b if (a−b) ∈ Z. (Z is the whole integers.) 1) Give two real numbers that are in the same equivalence class. 2) Give two real numbers that are not in the same equivalence class. 3) Prove that this relation is an equivalence relation.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT