Question

A relation R on a set A is called circular if for all a,b,c in A,...

A relation R on a set A is called circular if for all a,b,c in A, aRb and bRc imply cRa. Prove that a relation is an equivalence relation iff it is reflexive and circular.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A relation R is called atransitive if aRb and bRc implies cRa. Show that R is...
A relation R is called atransitive if aRb and bRc implies cRa. Show that R is reflexive and atransitive if and only if R is an equivalence relation.
the relation R on the set of all people where aRb means that a is younger...
the relation R on the set of all people where aRb means that a is younger than b. Determine if R is: reflexive symmetric transitive antisymmetric
Let X be finite set . Let R be the relation on P(X). A,B∈P(X) A R...
Let X be finite set . Let R be the relation on P(X). A,B∈P(X) A R B Iff |A|=|B| prove R is an equivalence relation
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z ,...
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z , aRb if and only if 4 | (a + 3b). (a) Prove that R is an equivalence relation. (b) Prove that for all integers a and b, aRb if and only if a ≡ b (mod 4)
Given a preorder R on a set A, prove that there is an equivalence relation S...
Given a preorder R on a set A, prove that there is an equivalence relation S on A and a partial ordering ≤ on A/S such that [a] S ≤ [b] S ⇐⇒ aRb.
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a...
Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a R b if and only if a is Facebook friends with b." Is this relation reflexive?  Is is symmetric?   Is it transitive?   Is it an equivalence relation? Briefly but clearly justify your answers.
Define a relation R on Z by aRb if and only if |a| = |b|. a)...
Define a relation R on Z by aRb if and only if |a| = |b|. a) Prove R is an equivalence relation b) Compute [0] and [n] for n in Z with n different than 0.
Let F = {A ⊆ Z : |A| < ∞} be the set of all finite...
Let F = {A ⊆ Z : |A| < ∞} be the set of all finite sets of integers. Let R be the relation on F defined by A R B if and only if |A| = |B|. (a) Prove or disprove: R is reflexive. (b) Prove or disprove: R is irreflexive. (c) Prove or disprove: R is symmetric. (d) Prove or disprove: R is antisymmetric. (e) Prove or disprove: R is transitive. (f) Is R an equivalence relation? Is...
Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x...
Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x and y have the same first name is an equivalence relation.