Question

as I show that P(A) and 2^A are numerically equivalent

as I show that P(A) and 2^A are numerically equivalent

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
4. Show that the following are equivalent for ∆ ⊆ P rop(A): (i) ∆ is complete;...
4. Show that the following are equivalent for ∆ ⊆ P rop(A): (i) ∆ is complete; and (ii) for all p ∈ P rop(A), if ∆ ∪ {p} is consistent, then ∆|− p.
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q...
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q —> r ) and ( p -> q) —> r b) p^ (q v r ) and ( p ^ q) v ( p ^ r )
Use two truth tables to show that the pair of compound statements are equivalent. p ∨...
Use two truth tables to show that the pair of compound statements are equivalent. p ∨ (q ∧ ~p); p ∨ q p q p ∨ (q ∧ ~p) T T ? ? ? ? ? T F ? ? ? ? ? F T ? ? ? ? ? F F ? ? ? ? ? p ∨ q T ? T T ? F F ? T F ? F
Are the statement forms P∨((Q∧R)∨ S) and ¬((¬ P)∧(¬(Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S))) logically equivalent? I found...
Are the statement forms P∨((Q∧R)∨ S) and ¬((¬ P)∧(¬(Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S))) logically equivalent? I found that they were not logically equivalent but wanted to check. Also, does the negation outside the parenthesis on the second statement form cancel out with the negation in front of P and in front of (Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S)) ?
Show that the intervals (0,1) and (-1,1) are equivalent and show that (-1,1) is equivalent to...
Show that the intervals (0,1) and (-1,1) are equivalent and show that (-1,1) is equivalent to the set of real numbers
Show the following are not logically equivalent: ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) and ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)).
Show the following are not logically equivalent: ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) and ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)).
Show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) "A force is called conservative if the work...
Show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) "A force is called conservative if the work it does on a system along any closed path is zero." (ii) "A force is called conservative if the work it does on a system to move it from configuration (a) to configuration (b) is independent of the chosen path."
Show if p >1 and p divides (p -1)! + 1, then p is prime.    I...
Show if p >1 and p divides (p -1)! + 1, then p is prime.    I need a direct proof.  
2. a. In what order are the operations in the following propositions performed? i. P ∨  ...
2. a. In what order are the operations in the following propositions performed? i. P ∨   ¬q ∨   r ∧   ¬p ii. P ∧   ¬q ∧   r ∧   ¬p iii. p ↔ q ∧   r → s b. Suppose that x is a proposition generated by p, q, and r that is equivalent to p ∨   ¬q. Write out x as a function of p, q, and r, and then give the truth table for x
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically...
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically equivalent. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear. Thanks 2) .Show that (p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r) → (q ∨ r) is a tautology. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear.