Question

Show the following are not logically equivalent: ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) and ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)).

Show the following are not logically equivalent: ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) and ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)).

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1


0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Show that ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) ̸≡ ∀x [P (x) ∨ Q(x)] By defining a universe...
Show that ∀xP (x) ∨ ∀xQ(x) ̸≡ ∀x [P (x) ∨ Q(x)] By defining a universe of discourse and predicts P, Q over it such that one side of the expression evaluates to true and the other side evaluates to false.
Discrete mathematics counterexamples - Supplementary question: S1.) Give a counterexample to show that "∀x(p(x) --> Q(x))...
Discrete mathematics counterexamples - Supplementary question: S1.) Give a counterexample to show that "∀x(p(x) --> Q(x)) and ∀xP(x) --> ∀xQ(x)" may not be logically equivalent.
If X does not occur free in Q, then ∀X(P(X) -> Q) is semantically equivalent with∃XP(X)...
If X does not occur free in Q, then ∀X(P(X) -> Q) is semantically equivalent with∃XP(X) -> Q. Give an example to show that these formulas will not necessarily be equivalent if X does occur free in Q.
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q...
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q —> r ) and ( p -> q) —> r b) p^ (q v r ) and ( p ^ q) v ( p ^ r )
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically...
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically equivalent. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear. Thanks 2) .Show that (p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r) → (q ∨ r) is a tautology. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear.
Are the statement forms P∨((Q∧R)∨ S) and ¬((¬ P)∧(¬(Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S))) logically equivalent? I found...
Are the statement forms P∨((Q∧R)∨ S) and ¬((¬ P)∧(¬(Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S))) logically equivalent? I found that they were not logically equivalent but wanted to check. Also, does the negation outside the parenthesis on the second statement form cancel out with the negation in front of P and in front of (Q∧ R)∧ (¬ S)) ?
(1) Determine whether the propositions p → (q ∨ ¬r) and (p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r...
(1) Determine whether the propositions p → (q ∨ ¬r) and (p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r are logically equivalent using either a truth table or laws of logic. (2) Let A, B and C be sets. If a is the proposition “x ∈ A”, b is the proposition “x ∈ B” and c is the proposition “x ∈ C”, write down a proposition involving a, b and c that is logically equivalentto“x∈A∪(B−C)”. (3) Consider the statement ∀x∃y¬P(x,y). Write down a...
Show that the following two formulas are NOT logically equivalent by giving a model in which...
Show that the following two formulas are NOT logically equivalent by giving a model in which one is true and the other is false:   ∃x ( R(x) → S(x) ) and ¬ ∀x ( R(x) ∧ S(x) )
Let P and Q be statements: (a) Use truth tables to show that ∼ (P or...
Let P and Q be statements: (a) Use truth tables to show that ∼ (P or Q) = (∼ P) and (∼ Q). (b) Show that ∼ (P and Q) is logically equivalent to (∼ P) or (∼ Q). (c) Summarize (in words) what we have learned from parts a and b.
Consider the following predicate formulas. F1: ∀x ( P(x) → Q(x) ) F2: ∀x P(x) →...
Consider the following predicate formulas. F1: ∀x ( P(x) → Q(x) ) F2: ∀x P(x) → Q(x) F3: ∃x ( P(x) → Q(x) ) F4: ∃x P(x) → Q(x) For each of the following questions, answer Yes or No & Justify briefly . (a) Does F1 logically imply F2? (b) Does F1 logically imply F3? (c) Does F1 logically imply F4? (d) Does F2 logically imply F1?
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT