Question

4. Prove explicitly that congruence modulo 4 is an equivalence relation. Then list the equivalence classes....

4. Prove explicitly that congruence modulo 4 is an equivalence relation.
Then list the equivalence classes.

5. Determine all of the equivalence classes for ZZ5

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
What are the equivalence classes for the relation congruence modulo 6? Please explain in detail.
What are the equivalence classes for the relation congruence modulo 6? Please explain in detail.
9e) fix n ∈ ℕ. Prove congruence modulo n is an equivalence relation on ℤ. How...
9e) fix n ∈ ℕ. Prove congruence modulo n is an equivalence relation on ℤ. How many equivalence classes does it have? 9f) fix n ∈ ℕ. Prove that if a ≡ b mod n and c ≡ d mod n then a + c ≡b + d mod n. 9g) fix n ∈ ℕ.Prove that if a ≡ b mod n and c ≡ d mod n then ac ≡bd mod n.
Prove: Proposition 11.13. Congruence modulo n is an equivalence relation on Z : (1) For every...
Prove: Proposition 11.13. Congruence modulo n is an equivalence relation on Z : (1) For every a ∈ Z, a = a mod n. (2) If a = b mod n then b = a mod n. (3) If a = b mod n and b = c mod n, then a = c mod n
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the...
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the information about the equivalence classes, as specified. a) The relation ∼ on R defined by x ∼ y iff x = y or xy = 2. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [2], [3], [−4/5 ], and [0] b) The relation ∼ on R+ × R+ defined by (x, y) ∼ (u, v) iff x2v = u2y. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [(5, 2)] and...
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R...
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. I had to prove it was an equivalence relation as well, but that part was not hard. Just want to know if the logic and presentation is sound for the last part: 8.48) A relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. Prove that R...
Determine whether the given relation is an equivalence relation on {1,2,3,4,5}. If the relation is an...
Determine whether the given relation is an equivalence relation on {1,2,3,4,5}. If the relation is an equivalence relation, list the equivalence classes (x, y E {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.) {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5), (1,3), (3,1), (3,4), (4,3)} If the relation above is not an equivalence relation, state that the relation is not an equivalence relation  and why. Example: "Not an equivalence relation. Relation is not symmetric" Remember to test all pairs in relation R
Prove that the relation of set equivalence is an equivalence relation.
Prove that the relation of set equivalence is an equivalence relation.
Let R be the relation of congruence mod4 on Z: aRb if a-b= 4k, for some...
Let R be the relation of congruence mod4 on Z: aRb if a-b= 4k, for some k E Z. (b) What integers are in the equivalence class of 31? (c) How many distinct equivalence classes are there? What are they? Repeat the above for congruence mod 5.
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the...
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the set A, then the set of equivalence classes of ∼ form a partition of A.
In the following two problems, the equivalence classes refer to the equivalence classes under the equivalence...
In the following two problems, the equivalence classes refer to the equivalence classes under the equivalence relation: aRb iff n|(a-b) where n is a fixed integer. Suppose a, b, c, d are elements of the integers such that [a] = [b] and [c] = [d]. 1. Prove [a+d] = [b+c]. 2. Prove [ac] = [bd]