Question

In Year 1, Major bought 5% of the shares of Minor when they were worth a...

  1. In Year 1, Major bought 5% of the shares of Minor when they were worth a total of $300,000. By the end of Year 3, the shares were worth $325,000. It accounted for this investment in years 1, 2, and 3 on the fair value method. On Day 1, Year 4, Major bought another 40% of the shares of Minor for $2,600,000, and switches to the equity method of accounting for this investment. Which of the following is correct about the appropriate accounting under GAAP?

    The Year 4, Day 1 balance for the Investment in Minor account should equal $2,900,000, equal to the cost of $300,000 for the first 5% plus the cost of the remaining 40%. No adjustments are needed to the Years 1, 2, and 3 financial statements

    The Year 4, Day 1 balance for the Investment in Minor account should equal $2,925,000, equal to the carrying value at the end of Year 3 of $325,000 for the first 5% (which includes the adjustment to fair value) plus the cost of the remaining 40%. No adjustments are needed to the Years1, 2, and 3 financial statements

    Adjustments are needed to Years 1, 2, and 3 results to assume that the equity method had been used for all three years. The Year 4, Day 1 Investment in Minor would then be found by adding the equity basis carrying amount for the 5% of stock to the $2,600,000 cost of the 40% bought in Year 4. The financial statements of Years 1, 2, and 3 would be restated.

    Same as answer 3, except that the financial statements of years 1, 2, and 3 would not be restated. Instead, Year 4’s statements would include a Prior Period Adjustment in the shareholder’s equity statement to record the difference between what the retained earnings would have been in the equity basis had been used, and what had been reported in the prior years.

  1. Assume that Major owns 25% of Minor, and uses the equity method. Also assume that during the year, Major bought $1 million in products from Minor. Minor recorded gross profits of $60,000 on this sale to Major. Major still has these items in inventory at the end of the year. Which of the following statements is correct?

    Major’s accounting will be the same as if Minor had sold these items to third parties. No adjustment is needed to either the equity in investee income account or to the Investment in Minor account.

    Major will defer its 25% share of the $60,000 gross profits until the products are eventually sold to outsiders. This will affect the reported equity in investee income account, and either the investment in Minor account, or inventory.

    Major will defer all of the $60,000 gross profits until the products are eventually sold to outsiders. This will affect the reported equity in investee income account, and either the investment in Minor account, or inventory.

    Major may choose any of the above options.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Q1 :

Answer :

Q2 :

Answer :

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Assume Big bought a small amount of stock in Little in Year 1, and properly used...
Assume Big bought a small amount of stock in Little in Year 1, and properly used the fair value method to account for this investment. In Year 2, it bought enough extra stock that it should use the equity method. True or false: Big should restate its Year 1 financial statements to show the investment as if it had used the equity method. True/False: Under the equity method of accounting for investments, an investor must record an impairment loss when...
Using the information from Exhibit 1.1 (p.8 Chapter 1) below answer questions 1 - 4 below:...
Using the information from Exhibit 1.1 (p.8 Chapter 1) below answer questions 1 - 4 below: EXHIBIT 1.1 Comparison of Fair Value Method (ASC 320) and Equity Method (ASC 323) FAIR VALUE EQUITY METHOD Influence Not Significant Influence Significant Little Company Big Company Big Company Carrying Fair Equity in Carrying Dividend Value Value Investee Value Year Income Dividends Income Investment Adjustment Income Investment 2014 $200,000 $50,000 $10,000 $235,000 $35,000 $40,000 $230,000 2015 300,000 100,000 20,000 255,000 55,000 60,000 270,000 2016...
The Big company spent $1,000,000 to obtain a 25% stake in Little. At that date, the...
The Big company spent $1,000,000 to obtain a 25% stake in Little. At that date, the net book value of Little’s assets and liabilities was $3,900,000. Little also had machines with remaining lives of 4 years, which had a fair value in total $100,000 higher than their book values. Big accounts for its investment under the equity method. Which of the following is correct? Each year, Big will record its 25% share of Little’s income, and will make no special...
On January 1, Year 1, Present Inc. purchased 80 percent of the outstanding voting shares of...
On January 1, Year 1, Present Inc. purchased 80 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Sunrise Co. for $3,000,000. On that date, Sunrise’s shareholders’ equity consisted of retained earnings of $1,500,000 and common shares of $1,000,000. Sunrise’s identifiable assets and liabilities had fair values that were equal to their carrying values on January 1, Year 1. Account balances for selected accounts for the Year 5 financial statements were as follows: Present Sunrise Property, plant, and equipment (net) $ 2,100,000...
QUESTION 33 On January 1, Year 1, Giant bought 80% of the shares of Son for...
QUESTION 33 On January 1, Year 1, Giant bought 80% of the shares of Son for $20 million. At the time, the fair value of the 20% noncontrolling interest was $4 million. The equity of Son on the date of acquisition was $16 million. Its common stock =$1 million and retained earnings =$15 million. All assets and liabilities had fair value equal to book value, except Son owned a building with a fair value $ of $30 million and a...
On January 1, Year 1, Giant bought 80% of the shares of Son for $20 million....
On January 1, Year 1, Giant bought 80% of the shares of Son for $20 million. At the time, the fair value of the 20% noncontrolling interest was $4 million. The equity of Son on the date of acquisition was $16 million. Its common stock =$1 million and retained earnings =$15 million. All assets and liabilities had fair value equal to book value, except Son owned a building with a fair value $ of $30 million and a book value...
Right Company purchased 25,000 common shares (25%) of ON Inc. on January 1, year 11, for...
Right Company purchased 25,000 common shares (25%) of ON Inc. on January 1, year 11, for $250,000. RIght uses the equity method to report its investment in ON because it has significant influence in the operating and investing decisions made by ON. Right has no legal obligation to pay any of ON's liabilities and has not committed to contribute any more funds to ON. Additional information for ON for the four years ending December 31, Year 14, is as follows:...
Parent Industries bought Subsidiary Inc.’s voting stock on January 1, 2019 for $42,000, when Subsidiary’s book...
Parent Industries bought Subsidiary Inc.’s voting stock on January 1, 2019 for $42,000, when Subsidiary’s book value was $8,000. Fair value information on Subsidiary’s assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition is as follows: Property and equipment (P&E) is overvalued by $7,000. P&E has a 10-year remaining life, straight-line. Previously unreported identifiable intangibles are valued at $8,000. These intangibles have indefinite lives, but testing reveals impairment of $2,000 in 2019 and $1,000 impairment in 2020. Goodwill reported for this...
Alpha bought 30% of the Common Shares of Beta on 1 January 2019 for the amount...
Alpha bought 30% of the Common Shares of Beta on 1 January 2019 for the amount of $300,000. The righteous value and book value of net Beta assets in that date was $1,000,000 and $900,000, respectively. The difference between the two values is due to a computer whose market value exceeds that of books by $ 60,000 and that depreciates in three years. The remnant of such difference is due to Goodwill. On May 19, 2019, Beta released the results...
Question 3 Not complete Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Review of pre-consolidation equity...
Question 3 Not complete Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Review of pre-consolidation equity method (controlling investment in affiliate, fair value differs from book value) Assume an investee has the following financial statement information for the three years ending December 31, 2019: (At December 31) 2019 2018 2017 Current assets $285,000 $277,500 $207,000 Tangible fixed assets 662,500 575,000 563,000 Intangible assets 40,000 45,000 50,000 Total assets $987,500 $897,500 $820,000 Current liabilities $120,000 $110,000 $100,000 Noncurrent liabilities 266,250 242,500...