Question

Incurring long-term debt with an arrangement whereby lenders receive an option to buy common stock during...

Incurring long-term debt with an arrangement whereby lenders receive an option to buy common stock during all or a portion of the time the debt is outstanding is a frequent corporate financing practice. In some situations, the result is achieved through the issuance of convertible bonds; in others, the debt instruments and the warrants to buy stock are separate.

At the start of the year, Huish Company issued $ 18,000,000 of 12% bonds along with detachable warrants to buy 1,200,000 shares of its $10 par value common stock at $18 per share. The bonds mature over the next 10 years, starting one year from date of issuance, with annual maturities of $ 1,800,000. At the time, Huish had 9,600,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The company received $ 20,040,000 for the bonds and the warrants. For Huish Company, 12% was a relatively low borrowing rate. If offered alone, at this time, the bonds would have sold in the market at a 22% discount.

(b) Prepare the journal entry for the issuance of the bonds and warrants for the cash consideration received

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer :-

(b) .Prepare the journal entry for the issuance of the bonds and warrants for the cash consideration received .

Account titles and explanation Debit Credit
Cash $ 20,040,000
Discount on issue of bond $3,960,000
Bonds payable $18,000,000
Additional paid-in-capital $6,000,000

Working notes :-

Discount on issue of bond = $ 18,000,000 * 22%

= $3,960,000

Discount on issue of bond = $3,960,000

Additional paid-in-capital = [ $ 20,040,000 + $3,960,000 ] - $18,000,000

= $24,000,000 - $18,000,000

Additional paid-in-capital = $6,000,000 .

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Sunland Corp. issued $18,000,000 par value 10% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not...
Sunland Corp. issued $18,000,000 par value 10% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Coronado Company issued $18,000,000 par value 10% bonds at 98. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling for $5. 3. Suppose Sepracor, Inc. called its convertible debt in 2020. Assume the following related to...
Bengts Inc offered detachable 10-year warrants to buy six shares of common stock (par value $1)...
Bengts Inc offered detachable 10-year warrants to buy six shares of common stock (par value $1) at $30 (at a time when the stock was selling for $35)The price paid for 500,$1,000 bonds with the warrants attached was $660,000. The market price of the Bengts bonds without the warrants was $540,000 and the market price of the warrants without the bonds was $90,000. What amount should be allocated to the bond premium or discount?
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Indigo Corp. issued $21,600,000 par value 11% convertible bonds at 97. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Sweet Company issued $21,600,000 par value 11% bonds at 96. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Tamarisk Corp. issued $20,300,000 par value 11% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Vaughn Company issued $20,300,000 par value 11% bonds at 98. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Sarasota Corp. issued $18,800,000 par value 11% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Ivanhoe Company issued $18,800,000 par value 11% bonds at 98. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Buffalo Corp. issued $18,700,000 par value 9% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Carla Company issued $18,700,000 par value 9% bonds at 98. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
For each of the unrelated transactions described beliw present the entries rewuired to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described beliw present the entries rewuired to record each transaction. 1. Pharoah Corp issued $21400000 par value 9% convertible bonds at 98. If the bonds had not been convertible the companys investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Novak Company issued $21400000 par value 9% bonds at 97. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At time of issuance the warrants were selling for...
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Carla Corp. issued $19,300,000 par value 10% convertible bonds at 99. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Sarasota Company issued $19,300,000 par value 10% bonds at 98. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction....
For each of the unrelated transactions described below, present the entries required to record each transaction. 1. Metlock Corp. issued $21,300,000 par value 9% convertible bonds at 97. If the bonds had not been convertible, the company’s investment banker estimates they would have been sold at 95. 2. Bonita Company issued $21,300,000 par value 9% bonds at 96. One detachable stock purchase warrant was issued with each $100 par value bond. At the time of issuance, the warrants were selling...
The stockholders’ equity section of Grouper Inc. at the beginning of the current year appears below....
The stockholders’ equity section of Grouper Inc. at the beginning of the current year appears below. Common stock, $10 par value, authorized 1,007,000 shares, 319,000 shares issued and outstanding $3,190,000 Paid-in capital in excess of par—common stock 575,000 Retained earnings 549,000 During the current year, the following transactions occurred: 1. The company issued to the stockholders 100,000 rights. Ten rights are needed to buy one share of stock at $30. The rights were void after 30 days. The market price...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT