1. Should a company allocate its common fixed expenses to business segments when computing the break-even point for those segments? Why?
2. When the units produced are greater than the units sold, which method would show the higher net operating income, variable costing or absorption costing? Explain.
1. A company should not allocate its common fixed expenses to business segments when computing the break-even point for those segments as they do not pertain particularly to the segment and allocation of the same would increase the number of units required to break even. Besides the common fixed expenses will be continued to get incurred even if the business segment is discontinued.
2. If the units produced are greater than the units sold, then absorption costing would show the higher net operating income. This would be the case as the fixed factory overhead per unit for the unsold goods would not be allocated in that period and this would result in a lower cost of goods sold.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.