PART ONE:
Barstow Manufacturing Company has two service departments — product design and engineering support, and two production departments — assembly and finishing. The distribution of each service department's efforts to the other departments is shown below:
FROM | TO | ||||||||||
Design | Support | Assembly | Finishing | ||||||||
Design | 0 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 70 | % | |||
Support | 10 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 50 | % | |||
The direct operating costs of the departments (including both variable and fixed costs) were as follows:
Design | $ | 130,000 |
Engineering Support | $ | 270,000 |
Assembly | $ | 490,000 |
Finishing | $ | 780,000 |
The total cost accumulated in the finishing department using the reciprocal method is(calculate all ratios and percentages to 4 decimal places, for example 33.3333%, and round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar):
$1,925,714.
$571,429.
$626,837.
$1,098,571.
$1,043,163.
PART TWO:
O'Leary Company manufactures Product Z in a two-stage production cycle in Departments A and B. Materials are added at the beginning of the process in Department B. O'Leary uses the weighted-average method. Conversion costs for Department B were 40% complete as to the 5,000 units in the beginning work-in-process (WIP) inventory and 50% complete as to the 7,000 units in the ending work-in-process inventory. 10,000 units were completed and transferred out of Department B during October. An analysis of the costs relating to work-in-process inventories and production activity in Department B for October follows:
Transferred- in Costs |
Materials Costs |
Conversion Costs |
||||||
WIP, October 1: | $ | 10,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||
Costs added in October | 24,000 | 5,500 | 4,400 | |||||
The total cost per equivalent unit transferred-out for October of Product Z, rounded to the nearest penny, was:
$2.75.
$2.80.
$2.85.
$2.90.
$2.95.
reciprocal method allocates cost to both support and production department
we will find out two equations
suppose the total cost of design is X
Suppose the total cost of engineering support is Y
X= $130,000 + 0.10Y..........1
Y = $270,000+ 0.20X............2
substituting (2) in (1)
X= $130,000 + 0.10($270,000+0.20X)
X= $130,000+27,000+0.02X
0.98X=$157,000
X=160,204
Y = $270,000+0.20*160,204
=$302,041
Design | Engineering | Assembly | Finishing | ||
cost | $130,000 | $270,000 | $490,000 | $780,000 | |
Cost allocation of design | ($160,204) | $32,041[$160,204*20%] | $16,020[$160,204*10%] | $112,143[$160,204*70%] | |
cost allocation of engineering | $30,204[$302,041*10%] | ($302,041) | $20,816[$302,041*40%] | $151,020[$302,041*50%] | |
$1,043,163 [$780,000+112,143+151,020] |
Answer : - $1,043,163
sorry we can only answer one question per post
Please upvoet if you find this helpful.Incase of query please comment.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.