Question

Hector is a building contractor and entered into a contract on February 1, 2018 to build...

Hector is a building contractor and entered into a contract on February 1, 2018 to build a house for Lois for $350,000 with a completion date of July 1, 2018. Payments are to be made to Hector by Lois of $50,000 on the signing of the contract, $150,000 on April 1, provided the house is partially completed as defined in the contract, and $150,000 on July 1, 2018, when the house is fully completed. Lois is very clear that the house must be finished by July 1, 2018 because she will return from her honeymoon that day and needs to move in on that day. The original payment on July 1 and the partial completion payment on April 1 are made by Lois. Lois is satisfied things are going well. However, she drives by the house on May 1 and is angry when it appears no one from Hector’s company is working and it doesn’t appear anything additional has been done since April 1. She contacts Hector, who admits that work has stopped on the house and that because of a labor dispute he cannot complete the job by the deadline of July 1 without an additional payment from Lois of $20,000 so he can hire additional workers. Lois is incensed, but ultimately agrees to pay the $20,000 and Hector assures her it will be completed by July 1. Hector completes the house on July 1, but Lois refuses to pay the final payment of $150,000 or the $20,000 on the additional agreement saying that Hector has breached the original contract by pointing out, among other things that the garage floor of the house was to be painted with an abrasive blue paint and that the fixtures in two of the bathrooms did not meet the specifications of the contract. Hector used a similar, but less expensive abrasive paint in the garage and similar but less expensive bathroom fixtures. It is estimated that the less expensive items saved him about $3,000. Hector counterclaims for $170,000. Discuss all the issues associated with this scenario. Who should win the litigation between Hector and Lois and how much is the relief to be received?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Hector is the contractor and Lois is the customer in the above case. The total cost is $350000

Payment : $ 50000 at the time of signing agreement, and $150000 partial payment while progressing the work and balance amount is $150000 once completed the work on agreed time.

contract effective February 1 2018 and completion date July 1 2018.  

Here the case is the Work has been completed at the agreed date but contractor hector incurred extra expense of $20000 due to labour strike.

Here the contractor Hector will win the case as they have completed the work by time and Lois to clear their payment. Assume the extract cost incurred is Hectors responsibility and Lois may consider as humanitarian concept. Hector supposed to receive the balance amount of $150000 only. Subject to Courts decision.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Curtiss Construction Company, Inc., entered into a fixed-price contract with Axelrod Associates on July 1, 2018,...
Curtiss Construction Company, Inc., entered into a fixed-price contract with Axelrod Associates on July 1, 2018, to construct a four-story office building. At that time, Curtiss estimated that it would take between two and three years to complete the project. The total contract price for construction of the building is $4,540,000. Curtiss concludes that the contract does not qualify for revenue recognition over time. The building was completed on December 31, 2020. Estimated percentage of completion, accumulated contract costs incurred,...
Curtiss Construction Company, Inc., entered into a fixed-price contract with Axelrod Associates on July 1, 2018,...
Curtiss Construction Company, Inc., entered into a fixed-price contract with Axelrod Associates on July 1, 2018, to construct a four-story office building. At that time, Curtiss estimated that it would take between two and three years to complete the project. The total contract price for construction of the building is $4,540,000. Curtiss concludes that the contract does not qualify for revenue recognition over time. The building was completed on December 31, 2020. Estimated percentage of completion, accumulated contract costs incurred,...
On February 1, 2021, Arrow Construction Company entered into a three-year construction contract to build a...
On February 1, 2021, Arrow Construction Company entered into a three-year construction contract to build a bridge for a price of $8,210,000. During 2021, costs of $2,070,000 were incurred with estimated costs of $4,070,000 yet to be incurred. Billings of $2,570,000 were sent, and cash collected was $2,320,000. In 2022, costs incurred were $2,570,000 with remaining costs estimated to be $3,705,000. 2022 billings were $2,820,000 and $2,545,000 cash was collected. The project was completed in 2023 after additional costs of...
1. On November 1, 2018, Taylor signed a one-year contract to provide handyman services on an...
1. On November 1, 2018, Taylor signed a one-year contract to provide handyman services on an as-needed basis to King Associates, with the contract to start immediately. King agreed to pay Taylor $5,400 for the one-year period. Taylor is confident that King will pay that amount, but payment is not scheduled to occur until 2019. Taylor should recognize revenue in 2018 in the amount of Multiple Choice a. $900 b. $2,700 c. $0 d. $5,400 2. Mary signed up and...
Bryan followed in his father’s footsteps and entered into the carpet business. He owns and operates...
Bryan followed in his father’s footsteps and entered into the carpet business. He owns and operates I Do Carpet (IDC). Bryan prefers to install carpet only, but in order to earn additional revenue, he also cleans carpets and sells carpet-cleaning supplies. A. IDC contracted with a homebuilder in December of last year to install carpet in 10 new homes being built. The contract price of $87,500 includes $53,000 for materials (carpet). The remaining $34,500 is for IDC’s service of installing...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you have completed a thorough and exacting investigation, you need to analyze all the infor- mation you have gathered. This is the time to consult with your business, financial, and legal advis- ers to arrive at an estimate of the value of the business. Outside advisers are impartial and are more likely to see the bad things about the business than are you. You should...