Question

1. In the crazy Eddie case, what financial statement fraud scheme did Eddie commit? a. fictitious...

1. In the crazy Eddie case, what financial statement fraud scheme did Eddie commit?

a. fictitious revenues

b. overstatement of inventory

c. all of these

d. Improper disclosures

2. which of the following accounting areas were involved in the financial statement fraud at health south?

a. Accounts Receivable

b. Mergers

c. Capitalized Assets

d. all of these

Business   Accounting   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer:-

1.In the crazy Eddie case,what financial statement fraud scheme did Eddie commit?---c.all of these.

Explanation:-Crazy Eddie's management reported fictitious revenues and profits.Also inventory was also overstated.Disclosures were not correct and proper in the financial statements.

2.d.all of these i.e.,accounts receivable,Mergers,Capitalized assets were involved in the financial statement fraud at health south.

Explanation:- Mr. Richard Scrushy,founder added non existent earnings and inflated assets in its financials.Also, auditors found out that Accounts receivable on money owed to Health South was booked as income.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Which of the following is the most common type of financial statement fraud? a - Overstatement...
Which of the following is the most common type of financial statement fraud? a - Overstatement of revenues b - Undervaluation of liabilities c - Understatement of losses d - Overvaluation of reserves According to the traditional economic theory, which of the following motivates smart, talented, well-educated, and seemingly respectable individuals to commit fraud? a - Self-interest b - Pressure c - Desire d - Incentive Which of the following is an example of prosecutorial misconduct? a - exaggerated medical...
1. In communications with clients, when should CPAs refer to themselves as auditors: a) During any...
1. In communications with clients, when should CPAs refer to themselves as auditors: a) During any type of engagement (Assurance or Attestation) b) Only for review and audit attestation engagements c) Only for audit attestation engagements d) For all compilation, review and audit engagements 2. A compilation report that omits substantially all notes and disclosures: a) Is not allowed b) Includes an adverse opinion c) Must indicate that management has elected to omit such information d) Includes a qualified opinion...
The Fraud Triangle LO 5-2 Explain the components of the Fraud Triangle. Donald R. Cressey, a...
The Fraud Triangle LO 5-2 Explain the components of the Fraud Triangle. Donald R. Cressey, a noted criminologist, is mostly credited with coming up with the concept of a Fraud Triangle. Albrecht points out that, while researching his doctoral thesis in the 1950s, Cressey developed a hypothesis of why people commit fraud. He found that trusted persons become trust violators when they conceive of themselves as having a financial problem that is nonsharable, are aware that this problem can be...
Items 1 through 10 represent possible errors and fraud that an auditor suspects are present. The...
Items 1 through 10 represent possible errors and fraud that an auditor suspects are present. The accompanying List of Auditing Procedures that the auditor would consider performing to gather evidence concerning possible errors and fraud. For each item, select one or two procedures, as indicated, that the auditor most likely would perform to gather evidence in support of that item and explain why you choose. Possible misstatements due to error and fraud 1. The auditor suspects that the controller wrote...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT