Question

On January 1, 2016, Pitt Company sold a patent to Chatham Inc. which had a carrying...

On January 1, 2016, Pitt Company sold a patent to Chatham Inc. which had a carrying value on Pitt's books of $10,000. Chatham gave Pitt a $60,000 non-interest-bearing note payable in five equal annual installments of $12,000 with the first payment due and paid on January 1, 2017. There was no established price for the patent, and the note has no ready market value. The prevailing rate of interest for a note of this type at January 1, 2016, is 12%.

(Click here to access the PV tables to use with this problem.)

Required:

1. Prepare a schedule showing the income or loss before income taxes that Pitt should record for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017.

If required, round your answers to the nearest cent.

PITT COMPANY
Income Before Income Taxes on Sales of Patent
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2017
2016 2017
$
$
$
Income before income taxes $ $

2. If Pitt inadvertently failed to discount the note and instead recorded it at its gross value, what would be the effect on income or loss before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016?

If required, round your answer to two decimal places.

Income before income taxes would be   by $ for 2016.

Homework Answers

Answer #1
1 12% rate Installment Amount
Year 1 0.893 12000 10716
Year 2 0.797 12000 9564
year 3 0.712 12000 8544
Year 4 0.635 12000 7620
Year 5 0.567 12000 6804
43248
Discounted value of notes payable 43248
Book value of patents 10000
Profit on sale of patents 33248
2 If not discounted
Amount received through payable 12000*5 60000
Book value of patents 10000
Profit on sale of patents 50000
Income before income tax would increase by 50,000-33248= $16752
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
On January 1, 2016, Lisa Company sold machinery with a book value of $118,000 to Mark...
On January 1, 2016, Lisa Company sold machinery with a book value of $118,000 to Mark Company. Mark signed a $180,000 non-interest-bearing note, payable in three $60,000 annual installments on December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The fair value of the machinery was $149,211.12 on the date of sale. The machinery had been purchased by Lisa at a cost of $160,000. Required: 1. Prepare all the journal entries on Lisa’s books for January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2018. 2....
On January 1, 2007, Garner Company sold property to Agler Company which originally cost Garner $760,000....
On January 1, 2007, Garner Company sold property to Agler Company which originally cost Garner $760,000. There was no established exchange price for this property. Agler gave Garner a $1,200,000 zero-interest-bearing note payable in three equal annual installments of $400,000 with the first payment due December 31, 2007. The note has no ready market. The prevailing rate of interest for a note of this type is 10%. The present value of a $1,200,000 note payable in three equal annual installments...
On January 1, 2017, Blue Corporation sold a building that cost $254,700 and that had accumulated...
On January 1, 2017, Blue Corporation sold a building that cost $254,700 and that had accumulated depreciation of $105,950 on the date of sale. Blue received as consideration a $244,700 non-interest-bearing note due on January 1, 2020. There was no established exchange price for the building, and the note had no ready market. The prevailing rate of interest for a note of this type on January 1, 2017, was 9%. At what amount should the gain from the sale of...
Larkspur had one patent recorded on its books as of January 1, 2017. This patent had...
Larkspur had one patent recorded on its books as of January 1, 2017. This patent had a book value of $144,000 and a remaining useful life of 6 years. During 2017, Larkspur incurred research and development costs of $202,300 related to this patent and was sued by a competitor to nullify the patent. On September 1, 2017, the Court found that Larkspur’s patent was valid and that its competitor could not use the process Larkspur had patented. The company incurred...
Smith Company acquired patent rights on January 6, 2013, for $857,700. The patent has a useful...
Smith Company acquired patent rights on January 6, 2013, for $857,700. The patent has a useful life equal to its legal life of nine years. On January 3, 2016, Smith successfully defended the patent in a lawsuit at a cost of $36,000. Required: A. Determine the patent amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. B. Journalize the adjusting entry to recognize the amortization. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles.
On January 1, 2004, Glenn Company sold property to Jefrey Company. There was no established exchange...
On January 1, 2004, Glenn Company sold property to Jefrey Company. There was no established exchange price for the property, and Jefrey gave Glenn a $1,000,000 zero-interest-bearing note payable in 5 equal annual installments of $200,000, with the first payment due December 31, 2004. The fair value of the land was $727,000 on January 1, 2004. Jefrey is uncertain as to the prevailing rate of interest for a note of this type. What should be the balance of the Discount...
Kleen Company acquired patent rights on January 10 of Year 1 for $2,800,000. The patent has...
Kleen Company acquired patent rights on January 10 of Year 1 for $2,800,000. The patent has a useful life equal to its legal life of eight years. On January 7 of Year 4, Kleen successfully defended the patent in a lawsuit at a cost of $38,000. Required: a. Determine the patent amortization expense for Year 4 ended December 31.
On January 1, 2016, Biotek purchased a patent for a new product for $36,000. At the...
On January 1, 2016, Biotek purchased a patent for a new product for $36,000. At the time of purchase, the patent was valid for 10 years; however, the patent's useful life was estimated to be only 5 years due to the competitive nature of the product. On December 31, 2018, the product is withdrawn from sale under governmental order because of an electrical hazard caused by the product. The charge against income during 2018 for this patent is?
On January 1, 2016, Roger Company began construction of a new warehouse. The building was finished...
On January 1, 2016, Roger Company began construction of a new warehouse. The building was finished and ready for use on December 31, 2016. Roger Spent $4,650,000 on the building. These expenditures were made evenly throughout the year. Roger's only outstanding interest-bearing debt throughout 2016 was a $5,000,000 not payable. The interest rate on this debt was 6%. What amount should be reported as an interest expense on Roger's 2016 income statement?
Larkspur Industries had one patent recorded on its books as of January 1, 2017. This patent...
Larkspur Industries had one patent recorded on its books as of January 1, 2017. This patent had a book value of $412,800 and a remaining useful life of 8 years. During 2017, Larkspur incurred research and development costs of $97,000 and brought a patent infringement suit against a competitor. On December 1, 2017, Larkspur received the good news that its patent was valid and that its competitor could not use the process Larkspur had patented. The company incurred $85,000 to...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT