The following three risk situations have been identified in the audit of Tatua.
Situation |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Acceptable Audit Risk |
7% |
6% |
6% |
Inherent Risk |
30% |
30% |
50% |
Control Risk |
40% |
50% |
25% |
Planned Detection Risk |
? |
? |
? |
Required:
Provide your answer for question (a) in the below table.
Situation |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Provide your workings here |
|||
|
collect evidence?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Situation |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Working: (FORMULA) AUDIT RISK= INHERENT RISK * CONTROL RISK * DETECTION RISK |
58.33% DR= AR/(IR*CR) DR= 0.07/(0.30*0.40) DR= 58.33% |
40% DR= AR/(IR*CR) DR= 0.06/(0.30*0.50) DR= 40.00% |
48% DR= AR/(IR*CR) DR= 0.06/(0.50*0.25) DR= 48% |
ANSWER B:
From the above calculation of Detection Risk under 3 different situations, we can clearly see that Detection Risk (DR) is highest in Situation 1 and lowest in Situation 2. Thus, an auditor has to do more auditing procedures to collect Audit Evidences in Situation 1 due to highest Detection Risk.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.