Question

1.   S offered to sell his house and lot to B for P2,000,000, who was interested...

1.   S offered to sell his house and lot to B for P2,000,000, who was interested in buying the same. In his letter, S stated that he was giving B a period of one-month within which to raise the amount. One week before the expiration of the one-month period. S told B that he is no longer willing to sell the property unless the price is increased to P3,000,000.

May B compel S to accept the P2,000,000 first offered? Explain.


2.   D died leaving property estimated at P1,000,000 to his sons S and T. Subsequently, S sold one-half of his inheritance to X for P300,000, although his share was still to be delivered.

Is the contract valid? Explain.


3.   S sold his only car for P100,000 to B. Unknown to S, B bought the car from him so that he could use the same in a bank robbery.

What is the status of the sale of the car by S to B? Explain.


4.   D and C entered into a contract wherein D agreed to give to C P50,000 within 30 days from the date of the execution of their agreement, which, however, does not state the consideration received by D from C.

What is the status of the contract between D and C? Explain.


5.   On June 1, 2019, S offered to sell his only car to B for P100,000. B accepted the offer by mailing his letter of acceptance on June 10, 2019. On June 12, 2019, B revoked his previous acceptance and mailed his letter of revocation on the same date. S received the letter of acceptance on June 14, 2019 and the letter of revocation on June 15, 2019.

Was the contract perfected? Explain.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1) Since, the first offer given by S to sell his house and lot to B for P2,000,000 have been revoked by him. B cannot compel S to accept the offer for P2,000,000.
As S has given the period of one month and the B have accepted the conditions of the same, the counter could have accepted by B.

2) The Property which was not in name of someone cannot be sold or tranferred to other person.
In the given case, Since D has died his property of P1,000,000 is sold by S one half of his inheritance to X for P3,000,000.
So the made contract is Invalid.

3) Since the contract made between S and B is made related to the sale of car not related to use of the car. The said contract is valid between the two. The car bought by B used for robbery is of no relevance related to contract.
So, the said contract is Valid.

4) Since, D have agreed to give to C P50,000 within 30 days within the execution of agreement. The said contract would be valid if C has accepted the agreement and conditions on the same.
So, the contract is Valid between the two.

5) Fact: S offereed to sell his car to B for P100,000,
B accepted the offer by mailing on June 10, 2019
B revoked the acceptance on June 12, 2019.
S recieved the letter of acceptance on June 14, 2019. and letter of revocation on June 15,2019.
The contract will be valid, if the letter of acceptance recieved early than the revocation by the offeree.
In this case, S recieved the acceptance letter before the revocation letter made by B.
So, the said is valid and equally executed by B to S.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
6.   A donated his land to B. Before the time he made the donation, he had...
6.   A donated his land to B. Before the time he made the donation, he had several debts, but he did not reserve enough property to pay all these debts. Instead, he made the donation. Is the donation presumed fraudulent? Explain. 7.   P appointed A as his agent to sell P's only Honda Civic car for P800,000 cash. On November 7, 2019, A pursuant to the authority granted to him by P, offered to sell the car to B at...
On June 1, Maureen sent a letter to Joel that offered to sell 10 000 shares...
On June 1, Maureen sent a letter to Joel that offered to sell 10 000 shares in Tadpole Inc (a computer software company) for $5 each. Her letter did not require Joel to respond by any particular date. On June 3, Tadpole Inc publicly announced that its engineers had perfected a new technology that would revolutionize the electronic commerce industry. On June 5, Joel returned from his cottage and learned of both Maureen's offer and the price of Tadpole Inc...
S promises to sell B his car for $1,500. When B returns to pick up the...
S promises to sell B his car for $1,500. When B returns to pick up the car S refuses to deliver. 1) Why do Seller's breach by refusing to deliver the goods? 2) If it has been determined that the fair value of this car was $2,200 and the buyer already committed to one month's non-refundable garage space to store the car, what would be the buyer's compensatory measure of damage under UCC Article 2? 3) If the buyer already...
“Unilateral contracts” are those in which only one side gives consideration to the other. True/False Privately...
“Unilateral contracts” are those in which only one side gives consideration to the other. True/False Privately owned businesses generally do not have to respect Constitutional rights of employees, because the Bill of Rights was designed just to protect people from actions of Government – not from actions of private parties like private businesses. True or False 3. True or False  “Chapter 7” bankruptcy petitions (sometimes referred to as “total liquidation”) are always filed voluntarily, by the debtor. The debtor cannot be...
i. True or False -Under the UCC, a contract for the sale of goods that includes...
i. True or False -Under the UCC, a contract for the sale of goods that includes open terms is void. T/F -Oral promises of fact made during the bargaining process are not express warranties. T/F -Warranties of title are assumed to exist in UCC transactions. T/F ii. Multiple choice -The requirements of a contract do not include: a. Consideration b. Practicality c. Legality d. Capacity -Defenses against the enforcement of a contract include: a. The lack of a party’s genuine...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have legal standing? A. The language must reflect the intent to become a party to a contract. B. All of the conditions under which the offer would be terminated must be identified. C. All the significant terms and/or conditions must be contained in the offer. D. The offer must be effectively communicated to the other party. 3 points    QUESTION 2 Which one of the...
A thumbs up will be given: Table 1 t A B C D 0       (14,900,000)...
A thumbs up will be given: Table 1 t A B C D 0       (14,900,000)       (17,900,000)       (16,600,000)        (19,700,000) 1          4,980,000          5,990,000          3,850,000           6,400,000 2          4,980,000          6,210,000          4,990,000           5,880,000 3          4,510,000          6,250,000          6,860,000           6,800,000 4          4,510,000          4,700,000          4,990,000           6,650,000 Risk High Average Low Average Table 1 shows the expected after-tax operating cash flows for each project. All projects are expected to...
Ralph Ellison Perspective of Literature Original Publication - American Law: The Third Century , Fred B....
Ralph Ellison Perspective of Literature Original Publication - American Law: The Third Century , Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1976. WHEN I was a young boy I often went out to the Oklahoma State Capitol, where I assisted Mr. J. D. Randolph with his duties as custodian of the State Law Library. I was about eleven years old at the time, quite impressionable, and very curious about the mysterious legal goings-on of the legislators. All the more so because while...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....