We constantly seem to be pricing ourselves out of some markets and not charging enough in others. Our pricing policy is pretty simple: we mark up our full manufacturing cost by 50%. That means a computer that costs us $2,000 to manufacture will sell for $3,000. Until now I thought this was a workable approach, but now I’m not so sure.
Steve Works, CEO, Cortland Manufacturing, Inc. (CMI)
Steve’s Controller, Sally Nomer, had just told him that she believed the computers might be priced inappropriately. Steve continued:
When I was at Leland [School of Management] I focused most of my attention on operations and marketing, convinced that those were the keys to my successful career. Cost accounting was boring and not relevant. But now my accountant is telling me that I need to think about a new way to assign manufacturing overhead to products, and I don’t even know where to start! I never dreamed that some day my career would come to this. I wish I’d paid more attention to those classes so I could understand what is going on here. I’m lost.
BACKGROUND
CMI manufactures several different models of computers, distributed to retail outlets throughout the 50 states. The company is proud of the user-friendly computers it produces, in particular their graphics capability. CMI claims the superb graphics are what distinguish its products from competitors.
CMI purchases raw materials in components and subassemblies made to its specifications from a very small group of highly reliable suppliers. It uses a single facility to house both manufacturing facility and administrative and sales offices. The factory workers operate three kinds of machines. Inspecting machines check the raw materials and test components and subassemblies to assure they are working to specifications. Soldering machines solder various components as necessary. Finally assembly machines put all the components and subassemblies together into finished computers. The processes can vary by computer model.
Depreciation, maintenance and repairs on the three types of machines account for about 40% of CMI’s overhead cost. The remainder of the overhead is made up of labor involved in receiving and handling the raw materials, adjusting and setting up machines for each new batch of computers, and inspecting and packing finished computers for shipping. Additional costs include insurance and depreciation on handling equipment, supplies, and utilities. The actual manufacturing effort (soldering, inspecting and assembly) is primarily automated, so CMI uses very little direct labor. The company also operates on a lean production model, so almost no inventories exist at the end of any period.
Most of the computers are sold in large orders to national electronic chains. However, the Cortland 2000 is not such a machine. It represents a recent effort by CMI to enter the scientific computing market. The quantity manufactured and sold of this machine is expected to be much lower than other models even when it gains its hoped-for market share. Fewer customers exist for this more sophisticated, powerful, high-priced machine. Nonetheless, Mr. Works has believed from the conception of this product that, when all manufacturing costs were considered, the Cortland 2000 would contribute a reasonable amount to CMI’s selling and administrative costs and profit. The name recognition it brought in its elite community should enhance sales of the more generally used computers.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CMI budgeted direct labor costs for 2010 at $60,000,000. Based on expected sales, the company estimated that raw material purchased and used would be $300,000,000. Manufacturing overhead was budgeted at $196,000,000. It is currently allocated to production on the basis of machine hours (MH). As mentioned above, computers are priced at full production cost plus a mark-up of 50%.
EXHIBIT 1 shows the expected direct manufacturing costs for two of the company’s computers. The Cortland 1000 is a very popular computer with a large production and sales volume. By contrast, the Cortland 2000, described above, is a state-of-the-art scientific computer with several special features. In particular, the Cortland 2000
Uses a new processing chip imported from Sweden.
Has special patented random access memory (RAM) that gives it extremely high input/output speed.
Is manufactured in very small batches to assure uniform quality from one computer to the next, to satisfy the users of the machines who have very high expectations for the performance of the machines they purchase.
Mr. Works’ concerns arose when Ms. Nomer told him that she thought the company’s traditional overhead allocation system was providing misleading cost information about the different types of products. She developed an analysis of the 2010 manufacturing overhead costs, shown in EXHIBIT 2. She classified the overhead costs described above into activities. She also gathered data, shown in EXHIBIT 3, for the 2010 production of the Cortland 1000 and the Cortland 2000. Mr. Works commented on the data:
I don’t know quite what to make of all this. Clearly I need some further explanation and analysis. I guess what I really need is some sense of what is the true manufacturing cost of each computer. I thought I knew that, but I didn’t really. Even though we cannot at this point change prices for 2010, we at least need to know if we’re covering full production cost on the Cortland 2000 and have something left to contribute to the company’s selling, general and administrative expenses. I thought this was so, but now … well, I’m not so sure. We’d better figure this out before we begin our budget cycle for 2011. Maybe I need to go back to school!
EXHIBIT 1: Direct manufacturing costs: | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
DM | $1,000 | $2,500 | |||
DL | $200 | $400 | |||
EXHIBIT 2: 2010 budgeted MOH - ABC | |||||
Activity | Cost driver | Driver units (Co.) | Cost | ||
Receive/handle materials | orders received | 200 | $90,000,000 | ||
Adjust/set up machines | # of SU | 2,000 | 12,000,000 | ||
Inspect, pack, ship | batches | 500 | 60,000,000 | ||
Inspect raw material | Inspection hr. | 200,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Solder parts | Soldering hr. | 200,000 | 12,000,000 | ||
Assemble computers | Assembly hr. | 100,000 | 12,000,000 | ||
Total MOH | $196,000,000 | ||||
EXHIBIT 3: Production data, Cortland 1000 and Cortland 2000 | |||||
item | Measure | Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||
Budgeted production | # of computers | 20,000 | 5,000 | ||
Received order size* | Size of order | 10,000 | 500 | ||
Batch size | # of computers | 5,000 | 100 | ||
Machine setups | # of SU per batch | 5 | 6 | ||
RM inspection time | Hr/computer | 1 | 2 | ||
Soldering time | Hr/computer | 3 | 1 | ||
Assembly time | Hr/computer | 1 | 1 | ||
* Number of computers one order of RMI will build | |||||
1. Predetermined OH rate - current | |||||
Machine hr = 200,000 + 200,000 + 100,000 = | 500,000 | ||||
Est cost / est MH = 196,000,000 / 500,000 = | $392 | per MH | |||
2. Cost per unit | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
DM | $1,000 | $2,500 | |||
DL | $200 | $400 | |||
MOH* | $1,960 | $1,568 | * MH = (1+3+1); (2+1+1) | 5 | |
total cost per unit | $3,160 | $4,468 | |||
3. Selling price | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
total cost per unit | $3,160 | $4,468 | |||
mark up 50% | $1,580 | $2,234 | |||
selling price | $4,740 | $6,702 | |||
4. Raw materials received per model | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
Budgeted production | 20,000 | 5,000 | |||
Received oder size | 10,000 | 500 | |||
# of R/M order | 2 | 10 | |||
5. Batches packed/shipped | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
Budgeted production | 20,000 | 5,000 | |||
Batch size | 5,000 | 100 | |||
# of Batches | 4 | 50 | |||
6. Maschine setups per model | |||||
Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | ||||
Maschine setups | 5 | 6 | |||
# of Batches | 4 | 50 | |||
Total Maschine setups | 20 | 300 | |||
7. Activity rates | |||||
A | B | A/B | |||
Activity | Cost driver | Driver units (Co.) | Cost | ||
Receive/handle materials | orders received | 200 | $90,000,000 | 450,000 | per order |
Adjust/set up machines | # of SU | 2,000 | 12,000,000 | 6,000 | per setup |
Inspect, pack, ship | batches | 500 | 60,000,000 | 120,000 | per batch |
Inspect raw material | Inspection hr. | 200,000 | 10,000,000 | 50 | per ins hr |
Solder parts | Soldering hr. | 200,000 | 12,000,000 | 60 | per sdr hr |
Assemble computers | Assembly hr. | 100,000 | 12,000,000 | 120 | per assm hr |
Total MOH | 0 | 0 | $196,000,000 | ||
8. Allocate OH | Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | |||
Activity | |||||
Receive/handle materials | 900,000 | 4,500,000 | |||
Adjust/set up machines | 120,000 | 1,800,000 | |||
Inspect, pack, ship | 480,000 | 6,000,000 | |||
Inspect raw material | 1,000,000 | 500,000 | |||
Solder parts | 3,600,000 | 300,000 | |||
Assemble computers | 2,400,000 | 600,000 | |||
Total Overhead | $ 8,500,000 | $ 13,700,000 | |||
9. Overhead Rate | |||||
# of Computers | 20,000 | 5,000 | |||
Overhead Rate | $ 425 | $ 2,740 | |||
10. Total mfg. cost | Cortland 1000 | Cortland 2000 | |||
Overhead Rate | $ 425 | $ 2,740 | |||
DM | $1,000 | $2,500 | |||
DL | $200 | $400 | |||
Total mfg Cost | $ 1,625 | $ 5,640 | |||
11. Selling price | |||||
Total mfg Cost | $ 1,625 | $ 5,640 | |||
mark up 50% | $ 812.50 | $ 2,820.00 | |||
Selling price | $ 2,438 | $ 8,460 | |||
QUESTIONS: 1.For and against ABC: possible answers: |
|||||
For: | |||||
Against: | |||||
2. What makes a new model more costly: | |||||
a | |||||
b | |||||
c | |||||
d | |||||
e |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.