Question

Question 3 – Audit Reports 12 Marks The following are three independent situations. For each case,...

Question 3 – Audit Reports 12 Marks The following are three independent situations. For each case, state the type of audit opinion that should be expressed and provide a brief explanation to justify your choice: a) A significant proportion of a retailer’s sales are on a cash basis and inadequate records have been maintained; there are no audit tests that can be done to satisfy yourself that the cash sales are accurate ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ b) The company that runs a dairy farm has prepared the financial report on a going concern basis; shortly after the year end the company’s contract with a major supermarket was cancelled. Without this customer you expect the business to cease trading within six months and it is unlikely that the company will be able to secure any new contracts in that time ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ c) A wholesaler has a policy of including all of its buildings in the balance sheet at cost less depreciation. You establish that one of the warehouses included in the balance sheet at a value of $20m has an actual market value of $23m

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(a): In this case the audit opinion that should be provided should be either a qualified audit opinion or a disclaimer audit opinion depending on the circumstances. This is because there is a scope limitation in this case.

(b): In this case the audit opinion that should be provided should be an adverse audit opinion. The facts of the case indicate that the chances of business not continuing is very high and as such the financial report should not be prepared on a going concern basis.

(c ): In this case the audit opinion that should be provided should be an unmodified opinion. This is because the policy of the company is to include all its buildings in the balance sheet at cost less depreciation. As such the accounts of the company requires no changes and hence an unmodified opinion will be apt.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....