Please provide a financial analysis between each company and explain in extensive detail each field as well as compare each one with the industrial average.
WMT | COST | |||
Cash Flow Analysis | Cash Flow Analysis | |||
Price / Cash Flow | 9.11 | Price / Cash Flow | 15.23 | |
Price / Free Cash Flow | -- | Price / Free Cash Flow | -- | |
Cash Flow / Net Income | 2.87 | Cash Flow / Net Income | 1.88 | |
Dividend Payout Ratio | 62.10 | Dividend Payout Ratio | 133.38 | |
Cash Generated / Cash Req | 1.75 | Cash Generated / Cash Req | 0.85 | |
Cash Dividend Coverage | 1.61 | Cash Dividend Coverage | 0.75 | |
Cash-oper / Sales | 5.66 | Cash-oper / Sales | 4.09 | |
Eff Interest Rate | 30.42 | Eff Interest Rate | 30.28 |
Industry Avg |
|
Price/Earnings |
22.1 |
Price/Book |
3.8 |
Price/Sales |
0.6 |
Price/Cash Flow |
9.6 |
Dividend Yield % |
1.9 |
Stock WMT has better operating margin than stock COST which tells that the WMT company is running its operation more smoothly than COST.
However, stock COST has a higher return on assets than stock WMT which shows that the stock COST is able to use its investment more profitably then stock WMT.
Also return on investment for stock COST is higher than stock WMT which shows that the company COST is able to use funds more efficiently than stock WMT.
Higher asset turnover of the stock COST tells that the company is able to use its assets more efficiently.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.