Question

The accountant-client privilege is a law that entails that ________. A. an accountant does not enjoy...

The accountant-client privilege is a law that entails that ________.

A. an accountant does not enjoy work product immunity when a client is accused of gross negligence

B. only an accountant's paperwork be taken as prima facie evidence against a client in a court action

C. only an accountant can serve as a witness for the client in a court action

D. an accountant cannot be called as a witness against a client in a court action
Business   Accounting   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The answer is option no( D)

The accountant-client privilege is a law that restrains an accountant from spilling out the information acquired from client .

The benefit of this law is that the client can share every infomation confidently as he knows that the account would't share the information with others because of the confidentiality provisions of accountant-client privilege law, and hence then the accountant can perform his duties with all available information.

Please upvote if the answer was helpfull

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
Create an argument supporting that the requirements of SOX have reduced corporate fraudulent activity due to...
Create an argument supporting that the requirements of SOX have reduced corporate fraudulent activity due to the requirements placed on public accounting firms, thereby providing greater assurances to public users of financial information. Provide support for your argument. Evaluate the issues related to the audit of Satyam Computer Services Limited, indicating whether or not PWC followed auditing standards in rendering its audit opinion of the company. Provide support for your rationale. Assess whether PWC relied too heavily on the established...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you have completed a thorough and exacting investigation, you need to analyze all the infor- mation you have gathered. This is the time to consult with your business, financial, and legal advis- ers to arrive at an estimate of the value of the business. Outside advisers are impartial and are more likely to see the bad things about the business than are you. You should...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT