Question

Question 1                                        &nbsp

Question 1                                                 
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry.
The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd
(In millions)
Receivables:
December 31, 2015                                  R 1,968
December 31, 2014                                        642
Revenue for the year ended:
December 31, 2015                                   46,980
December 31, 2014                                   40,023
The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings:
(In millions)
Accounts and notes receivable, net
December 31, 2015                                    R 246
December 31, 2014                                       264
Revenues for the year ended:
December 31, 2015                                    4,335
December 31, 2014                                    4,251
Required:
1. Calculate the accounts receivable turnover ratios for Houston House and Whitney Holdings for the most recent year.
2. Calculate the average collection period, in days, for both companies for the most recent year. Comment on the reasonableness of the collection periods for these companies considering the nature of their business.
3. Which company appears to be performing better? What other information should you consider in determining how these companies are performing?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Requirement – 1 Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio

Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio = Net Sale or Revenue / Average Accounts Receivables

Houston House

= $46,980 / [ (1,968 + 642 ) / 2 ]

= $46,980 / 1,305

= 36

Whitney Holdings

= $4,335 / [ (246 + 264 ) / 2 ]

= $4,335 / 255

= 17

Requirement – 2 Average collection period, in days

Average collection period, in days = 365 Days / Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio

Houston House

= 365 Days / 36

= 10 Days ( Rounded to 0 Decimal)

Whitney Holdings

= 365 Days / 17

= 21 Days ( Rounded to 0 Decimal)

Requirement – 3 Which company appears to be performing better?

Houston House is appears to be performing better Since it has the higher Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio. A high Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio means that the companies are collecting accounts receivables on a timely manner and therefore higher ratio would be more favorable

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
SECTION A: FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING Question 1                                    &n
SECTION A: FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING Question 1                                                                                                                                          [10 marks] Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd (In millions) Receivables:                                                                       December 31, 2015                                                                          R 1,968 December 31, 2014                                                                          642 Revenue for the year ended: December 31, 2015                                                                          46,980 December 31, 2014                                                                          40,023 The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings: (In millions) Accounts and notes...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd (In millions) Receivables: December 31, 2015    R 1,968 December 31, 2014    642 Revenue for the year ended: December 31, 2015 46,980 December 31, 2014 40,023 The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings: (In millions) Accounts and notes receivable, net December 31, 2015 R 246...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd (In millions) Receivables: December 31, 2015 R 1,968 December 31, 2014 642 Revenue for the year ended: December 31, 2015 46,980 December 31, 2014 40,023 The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings: (In millions) Accounts and notes receivable, net December 31, 2015 R 246 December 31,...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information...
Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd (In millions) Receivables: December 31, 2015 R 1,968 December 31, 2014 642 Revenue for the year ended: December 31, 2015 46,980 December 31, 2014 40,023 The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings: (In millions) Accounts and notes receivable, net December 31, 2015 R 246 December 31,...
Question 1 [10 marks] Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same...
Question 1 [10 marks] Houston House (Pty) Ltd and Whitney Holdings are competitors in the same industry. The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Houston House (Pty) Ltd (In millions) Receivables: December 31, 2015 R 1,968 December 31, 2014 642 Revenue for the year ended: December 31, 2015 46,980 December 31, 2014 40,023 The following information was summarised from a recent annual report of Whitney Holdings: (In millions) Accounts and notes receivable, net December 31, 2015...
Procter Company owns 90% of the outstanding stock of Silex Company. On January 1, 2014, Silex...
Procter Company owns 90% of the outstanding stock of Silex Company. On January 1, 2014, Silex Company sold land to Procter Company for $350,000. Silex had originally purchased the land on June 30, 2010, for $200,000. Procter Company plans to construct a building on the land bought from Silex in which it will house new production machinery. The estimated useful life of the building and the new machinery is 15 years. Required: A. Prepare the entries on the books of...
Following is information for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company for three recent years. Reconcile the retained...
Following is information for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company for three recent years. Reconcile the retained earnings account for the three-year period. (in millions) Retained earnings, December 31, 2016 5,808 Net income, 2016 1,264 Net income, 2015 307 Net income, 2014 2,452 Other, 2016 56 Dividends, 2016 82 Dividends, 2015 68 Dividends, 2014 67 show work thanks
The following information is available for Elm Tree Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015:...
The following information is available for Elm Tree Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015: Collection of principal on long-term loan to a supplier $25,000 Purchase of equipment for cash 12,000 Proceeds from the sale of long-term investment at carrying amount 28,000 Issue of common shares for cash 23,500 Payment of cash dividends 47,250 Purchase of land by issuing common shares 35,000 In addition, the following information is available from the comparative statements of financial position for Elm Tree...
Use the following information to answer questions 1 - 13 As of December 31, 2014 assets...
Use the following information to answer questions 1 - 13 As of December 31, 2014 assets were $20, liabilities were $12 and paid-in-capital was $1. There was no treasury stock or accumulated other comprehensive income at either the beginning or ending of 2015. During the year revenues were $40, gains (net of losses) were $1, paid-in-capital increased by $2 and the company paid out dividends of $4. At the end of the year, equity was $22 and total liabilities were...
Comparing Two Companies in the Same Industry: Under Armour and Columbia Sportswear The following information is...
Comparing Two Companies in the Same Industry: Under Armour and Columbia Sportswear The following information is available from the financial statements included in Form 10-K for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 for Under Armour, Inc. and Columbia Sportswear Company (in thousands of dollars): Under Armour, Inc. Columbia Sportswear Company Net revenues (Net sales for Under Armour, Inc. & Columbia Sportswear) for the year ended December 31, 2014 $3,084,370 $2,100,590 Accounts receivable, net: December 31, 2014 279,835 344,390 December 31, 2013...