Question

1. Per the article:  Fraudsters Beware: The Taxman Cometh, Proceeds from an embezzlement are considered income by...

1. Per the article:  Fraudsters Beware: The Taxman Cometh, Proceeds from an embezzlement are considered income by the IRS.

True or False ?

2. Both spouses are always held liable for taxes and penalties if a joint return is filed and it is proven to be fraudulent.

True or False ?

4. Per article Tax Fraud: The Pitfalls of Representing Clients Before the IRS, Any statement made by the client to his CPA tax return preparer is considered privileged communication.

True or False ?

5. In regard to civil tax fraud which of the following is false?

MULTIPLE CHOICE

a. Taypayers can make innocent errors and not be held liable for the civil fraud penalty.

b. The computation of the civil fraud penalty under IRC 6663 is determined by multiplying the 75% penalty rate by the amount of the tax underpayment that the taxpayer cannot prove was due to innocent errors.

c. The government has the burden of proof to show that any part of an underpayment is due to fraud and that standard is defined as "beyond a reasonable doubt".

d. The civil fraud penalty is not applied to any portion of the underpayment that the defendant shows in not due to fraud by a preponderance of evidence.

8. Federal tax crimes include willfully evading tax or willfully failing to pay a tax, making false statements on any tax return that is to be filed with the federal government, and/or aiding in the preparation of fraudulent returns.

True or False ?

10. Ad valorem taxes are based on the value of the asset.

True or False ?

12. Failure to file a return is prima facie evidence of criminal intent when it happens two years in a row.

True or False ?

Homework Answers

Answer #1
ans 1
True
The proceeds from embezzlement is considered in gross income. If there is failure to declare it, than it is considered as fraud. There can be fine upto $100000 or.and five year imprisonment
ans 2
TRUE
If there is any fraud made by any one spouse the other spouse is also liable for any of the taxes or penalties imposed due to fraud
ans 4
FALSE
Privilaged communication is when the client needs tax adive from CPA
ans 5
c. The government has the burden of proof to show that any part of an underpayment is due to fraud and that standard is defined as "beyond a reasonable doubt".
ans 8 True
ans 10 True
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
In 2017​, Andrew​, who is​ single, has a comfortable salary from his job as well as...
In 2017​, Andrew​, who is​ single, has a comfortable salary from his job as well as income from his investment portfolio.​ However, he is habitually late in filing his federal income tax return. He did not file his 2017 income tax return until December 10, 2018 (due date was April 17​, 2018​) and no extensions of time to file the return were filed. Below are amounts from his 2017return: Taxable income $140,000 Total tax liability on taxable income 32,182 Total...
Under the LB&I Directive on Information Document Requests Enforcement Process, all of the following are part...
Under the LB&I Directive on Information Document Requests Enforcement Process, all of the following are part of the mandatory enforcement process, except: Delinquency Notice. Notice of Deficiency. Pre-summons Letter. Summons. Miles Patrick’s timely filed Form 1040 for the 2010 tax year is selected for audit and the Service ultimately issues a timely SNOD asserting $100,000 in additional tax due arising from Miles’ failure to substantiate business expenses. (The Service never provided Miles with a 30-day letter). Miles does not file...
10. Scott takes $10,000 from his bank account to set up a small donut-shop business. He...
10. Scott takes $10,000 from his bank account to set up a small donut-shop business. He meets with an attorney, and finds out he can set up a sole proprietorship for under $100, but a corporation would cost over $500 ($175 to the state, about $400 to the attorney). He decides on a sole proprietorship. He signs a one-year lease, and starts his business. After six months of operations, he closes the business because of much-lower-than-expected sales. After using the...
Why do you suppose the marketing of the tax shelters at KPMG grew so fast? a.Transformational...
Why do you suppose the marketing of the tax shelters at KPMG grew so fast? a.Transformational leadership b. Moral manager c. Social learning theory d. Moral intensity [The following information applies to the question.] In Chapter 4 we discussed the artificial tax shelter arrangements developed by KPMG LLP for wealthy clients that led to the settlement of a legal action with the Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. On August 29, 2005, KPMG admitted to criminal wrongdoing and...
QUESTION 1 A contract induced by improper threats or undue influence is void. True False 1...
QUESTION 1 A contract induced by improper threats or undue influence is void. True False 1 points    QUESTION 2 A contract made by a person under guardianship is voidable. True False 1 points    QUESTION 3 A contract with a minor remains in force unless the minor decides that he or she does not wish to be bound by it. True False 1 points    QUESTION 4 A person who was intoxicated at the time he made a contract...
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay...
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay a $2 million penalty to settle civil charges—brought by the PCAOB—that the firm violated federal audit rules by allowing its former partner to continue participating in the firm’s public company audit practice, even though he had been suspended over other rule violations. The former partner, Christopher Anderson, settled with the PCAOB in 2008 by agreeing to a $25,000 fine and a one-year suspension for...
Case 10.1: Avanti Press v. Employment Dept. Tax Sec., 274 P.3d 190 Facts: Waiau was an...
Case 10.1: Avanti Press v. Employment Dept. Tax Sec., 274 P.3d 190 Facts: Waiau was an employee of One Coast, a company that represented various businesses, including Avanti. In early 2009, One Coast dissolved. Waiau, who had nearly 30 years of experience as a product sales representative in the greeting card and gift industries, then entered into a written agreement with Avanti to sell the company’s greeting cards, journals, and calendars. The Agreement provided, among other things, that: Waiau would...
What are 4 key things you learned about the topic from reading their paper? How does...
What are 4 key things you learned about the topic from reading their paper? How does the topic relate to you and your current or past job? Critique the paper in terms of the organization and quality. Team 3 answer questions above. Part I In today’s world we see fear among people when dealing with sexual harassment. This leads to people not reporting sexual harassment. A misconception about sexual harassment is that it’s only about touching and forcing other people...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you have completed a thorough and exacting investigation, you need to analyze all the infor- mation you have gathered. This is the time to consult with your business, financial, and legal advis- ers to arrive at an estimate of the value of the business. Outside advisers are impartial and are more likely to see the bad things about the business than are you. You should...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT