Amazon Corporation is considering two long-term capital investment proposals. Relevant data on each project are as follows.
Project Milo |
Project Otis |
|||
|
Capital investment |
$196,000 |
$223,000 |
|
Annual net cash flows: |
||||
Year |
1 |
64,644 |
64,748 |
|
2 |
55,388 |
64,748 |
||
3 |
52,459 |
64,748 |
||
4 |
49,686 |
64,748 |
||
5 |
47,235 |
64,748 |
||
Total |
$ 269.412 |
$323,740 |
Other information: The company’s minimum rate of return is the company’s cost of capital which is 12%. Assume cash flows occur evenly throughout the year.
Instructions:
Compute the following and rank the projects for each category:
a.Compute the cash payback period for each project. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
b.Compute the net present value for each project. Use the appropriate tables from Appendix G. (Round your answers to 0 decimal places.)
c.Rank the projects on each of the foregoing bases. Which project do you recommend?
SHOW ALL COMPUTATIONS | ||||||
(a) Cash payback period | ||||||
Milo | ||||||
Otis | ||||||
(b) | ||||||
Project Milo | Project Otis | |||||
12% Discount | Cash | Cash | ||||
Year | Factor | Inflow | PV | Inflow | PV | |
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
NPV | ||||||
(c.) | Rank the projects on each of the criteria below. Which project do you recommend? | ||||
Show ranking here | |||||
Net | |||||
Cash | Present | ||||
Project | Payback | Value | |||
Milo | |||||
Otis | |||||
The project that should be accepted is: | |||||
(and explain why or why not the projects should be accepted) |
a)
Milo:
Project Milo | ||||
Year | Unrecovered at the Beginning | Investment | Cash Inflow | Unrecovered at the end |
1 | 196,000 | 196,000 | 64,644 | 131,356 |
2 | 131,356 | 55,388 | 75,968 | |
3 | 75,968 | 52,459 | 23,509 | |
4 | 23,509 | 49,686 | ||
5 | - | 47,235 |
Payback Period | Years before full recovery + (Unrecovered investment at start of the year/Cash flow during the year) |
Payback Period | 3+23509/49686 |
Payback Period | 3.47 Years |
Otis:
Payback Period | Investment/Cash Flow |
Cashflow | 64,748 |
Investment | 223,000 |
Payback Period | 3.44 Years |
b)
Project Milo | Project Otis | ||||
Year | Present Value Factor @12% | Cahflow | Present value | Cahflow | Present value |
1 | 0.893 | 64,644 | 57,727 | 64,748 | 57,820 |
2 | 0.797 | 55,388 | 44,144 | 64,748 | 51,604 |
3 | 0.712 | 52,459 | 37,351 | 64,748 | 46,101 |
4 | 0.636 | 49,686 | 31,600 | 64,748 | 41,180 |
5 | 0.567 | 47,235 | 26,782 | 64,748 | 36,712 |
Present value of Cash Inflows | 197,605 | 233,417 |
Project Milo | Project Otis | |
Present value of inflows | 197,605 | 233,417 |
Less: Initial Investment | 196,000 | 223,000 |
Net present value | 1,605 | 10,417 |
c)
Payback | NPV | |
Project Milo | 1 | 2 |
Project Otis | 2 | 1 |
Project Otis should be accepted as the NPV of Otis is far more than Milo. And the Payback period is also near to the Project Milo.
Dear Student,
Best effort has been made to give quality and correct answer. But if you find any issues please comment your concern. I will definitely resolve your query.
Also please give your positive rating.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.