Direct Method, Reciprocal Method, Overhead Rates
Macalister Corporation is developing departmental overhead rates based on direct labor hours for its two production departments—Molding and Assembly. The Molding Department employs 23 people, and the Assembly Department employs 81 people. Each person in these two departments works 2,010 hours per year. The production-related overhead costs for the Molding Department are budgeted at $238,000, and the Assembly Department costs are budgeted at $91,000. Two support departments—Engineering and General Factory—directly support the two production departments and have budgeted costs of $246,000 and $350,000, respectively. The production departments’ overhead rates cannot be determined until the support departments’ costs are properly allocated. The following schedule reflects the use of the Engineering Department’s and General Factory Department’s output by the various departments.
Engineering | General Factory | Molding | Assembly | |
Engineering hours | — | 1,900 | 2,100 | 7,900 |
Square feet | 134,820 | — | 442,980 | 64,200 |
For all requirements, round allocation ratios to four significant digits and round allocated costs to the nearest dollar.
Required:
1. Calculate the overhead rates per direct labor hour for the Molding Department and the Assembly Department using the direct allocation method to charge the production departments for support department costs. Round final answers to the nearest cent.
Overhead rate per DLH | |
Molding | $ |
Assembly | $ |
2. Calculate the overhead rates per direct labor hour for the Molding Department and the Assembly Department using the reciprocal method to charge support department costs to each other and to the production departments. Round final answers to the nearest cent. Round your intermediate calculations to four decimal places.
Overhead rate per DLH | |
Molding | $ |
Assembly | $ |
3. Explain the difference between the methods, and indicate the arguments generally presented to support the reciprocal method over the direct allocation method. (CMA adapted)
Molding | Assembly | |
Direct labor hour per employee | 2,010 | 2,010 |
Multiply: Number of employees | 23 | 81 |
Direct labor hours | 46,230 | 162,810 |
Answer 1
Direct method | ||||
Department | Engineering | General Factory | Molding | Assembly |
Direct overhead | 246,000 | 350,000 | 238,000 | 91,000 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 2100 : 7900 respectively (2100+7900=10000) (For Molding = 246000*2100/10000) | (246,000) | 51,660 | 194,340 | |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 442980 : 64200 respectively (442980+64200=507180) (For Molding = 350000*442980/507180) | (350,000) | 305,696 | 44,304 | |
Total cost after departmental allocation using direct method | - | - | $ 595,356 | $ 329,644 |
Divided by: Number of Direct labor hours | 46,230 | 162,810 | ||
Overhead rate per DLH using direct method | $ 12.88 | $ 2.02 |
Answer 2
Reciprocal method | ||||
Department | Engineering | General Factory | Molding | Assembly |
Direct overhead | 246,000.00 | 350,000.00 | 238,000.00 | 91,000.00 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 1900 : 2100 : 7900 respectively | (246,000.00) | 39,277.31 | 43,411.76 | 163,310.92 |
Total | - | 389,277.31 | 281,411.76 | 254,310.92 |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 134820 : 442980 : 64200 respectively | 81,748.24 | (389,277.31) | 268,601.34 | 38,927.73 |
Total | 81,748.24 | - | 550,013.11 | 293,238.66 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 1900 : 2100 : 7900 respectively | (81,748.24) | 13,052.24 | 14,426.16 | 54,269.84 |
Total | - | 13,052.24 | 564,439.27 | 347,508.49 |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 134820 : 442980 : 64200 respectively | 2,740.97 | (13,052.24) | 9,006.05 | 1,305.22 |
Total | 2,740.97 | - | 573,445.31 | 348,813.72 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 1900 : 2100 : 7900 respectively | (2,740.97) | 437.63 | 483.70 | 1,819.64 |
Total | - | 437.63 | 573,929.01 | 350,633.35 |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 134820 : 442980 : 64200 respectively | 91.90 | (437.63) | 301.97 | 43.76 |
Total | 91.90 | - | 574,230.98 | 350,677.12 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 1900 : 2100 : 7900 respectively | (91.90) | 14.67 | 16.22 | 61.01 |
Total | - | 14.67 | 574,247.20 | 350,738.13 |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 134820 : 442980 : 64200 respectively | 3.08 | (14.67) | 10.12 | 1.47 |
Total | 3.08 | - | 574,257.32 | 350,739.59 |
Allocated Engineering In Proportion of 1900 : 2100 : 7900 respectively | (3.08) | 0.49 | 0.54 | 2.05 |
Total | - | 0.49 | 574,257.87 | 350,741.64 |
Allocated General Factory In Proportion of 134820 : 442980 : 64200 respectively | 0.10 | (0.49) | 0.34 | 0.05 |
Total cost after departmental allocation using Reciprocal method | - | - | $ 574,258 | $ 350,742 |
Divided by: Number of Direct labor hours | 46,230 | 162,810 | ||
Overhead rate per DLH using Reciprocal method | $ 12.42 | $ 2.15 |
we can stop the same process when the Balance left in service Departments become negligible. |
Answer 3
Direct method of allocation should ignore any service rendered by one service (support) department to another support department. It is allocated the cost of the service department to directly to the production department without allocating the o service department. | ||||||
Reciprocal method of allocation should to the production department as well as other services (support) department (in case of any service (support) render to other service departments.) | ||||||
Reciprocal method of allocation is most useful because of under this method, Cost of service department should be allocated to all departments, irrespective of support department or production department. |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.