Question

You are an Audit Senior currently planning the 30 June 20X8 audit of Forest Limited, an...

You are an Audit Senior currently planning the 30 June 20X8 audit of Forest Limited, an Australian-owned company that produces and exports woodchips to Japan. Forest’s operations are located in Eden, on the far south coast of NSW. Timber is purchased from forests nearby, processed into woodchips and immediately stockpiled for export at the company’s shipyards at Twofold Bay. Forest contracts timber cutters to deliver set tonnages of logs to its mill throughout the year. Woodchips are transported to Japan on charter vessels, which make an average of one trip a month.
At a recent planning meeting with Forest Limited’s senior staff, you obtained the following overview of this year’s operations:
A massive conveyor belt is used to transport the woodchips from the mill to the stockpile. The manufacturer of this belt was recently taken over by an overseas competitor of Forest Limited, Chipper Limited, which processes woodchips in several South-East Asian countries. Chipper Limited has indicated that it is willing to sell equipment to its competitors, but at double the price it will sell to its other customers. It is doubtful whether any other companies in the world manufacture such specialised conveyor belts.
Based on current usage figures, it is expected that the existing conveyor belt will last until December 20X9. Sufficient spare parts are on hand to carry out routine maintenance work. However, should a replacement belt be required, it would take at least six months to have a replacement made and shipped to Australia, and a further four weeks to install and test it. It is unlikely that the company could survive a six-month interruption to normal operations. Management are currently deciding whether they should order a replacement belt from Chipper Limited despite the excessive cost, or continue to search for an alternate supplier.
Timber is purchased in 50 hectare lots from plantations and state forests. In the past, 70% of timber was sourced from plantations, however this has fallen to 50% in the current year. The corresponding increase in timber sourced from state forests has angered environmental groups. Protests have been held in several forests, which has slowed production and frustrated the contractors, who are only paid once set tonnages of timber are delivered to the mill. In addition, several shipments of woodchips have been delayed, angering the Japanese customers who are threatening to deduct 20% from amounts owing as compensation for lost production time.
Last month, a protester suffered a broken leg, allegedly because he was hit by a timber truck. The protester was blocking the main access road to one of the state forests at the time of the accident. The protester is now suing Forest Limited for damages, claiming the contractor was in fact an employee of Forest Limited at the time of the accident, and was acting on Forest Limited’s instructions. Forest Limited is fighting the case and appears to have a reasonable chance of winning; however, the adverse publicity being
generated is making the state government nervous about selling Forest Limited any more of its timber resources.
One of Forest Limited’s customers, Wood Limited, is claiming that the latest batch of woodchips it received was contaminated with a microbe. This microbe affects the physical structure of the chips, reducing the pressure the chips can withstand when compressed. This has made the chips useless for heavy duty items such as desks and bookcases. Wood Limited is refusing to pay its account, which is already five months overdue. Forest Limited has launched an investigation into the allegations, but as yet has not been able to substantiate them.
In January, Forest Limited upgraded its accounts payable system to a fully integrated package that automatically updates the general ledger when creditor entries are made. Some problems have been experienced with the creditors ledger, which is split into $US and $AUD amounts. In some cases, $US amounts have been recorded as $AUD, resulting in inaccurate creditor balances. Month-end rollovers have also proved problematic, with creditor balances being incorrectly re-set to zero at the first of every month. This has required each creditor’s history to be re-entered manually each month, a time-consuming process that is taking accounting staff away from their normal duties.
During the period, the Australian dollar has remained steady against the Yen, although it fell by about 3% against the US dollar. Debtors are invoiced in $US at the time of shipment, and paid in $US one month after the shipment is received. It takes around six weeks for the charter vessels to travel from Twofold Bay to Japan. All plantations from which Forest Limited sources timber are owned by US firms, which demand payment in $US prior to the timber being cut. A recent downturn in the Japanese economy is affecting forward orders, which have fallen by 15%.
Required:
Prepare a memorandum to the audit manager, outlining your risk assessment relating to Forest Limited. When making your risk assessment:
(a) Identify three (3) key accounts from the information provided that are subjected to an increase in audit risk. Briefly explain what factors increase the audit risk associated with the three (3) accounts identified. In your explanation, please mention the key assertion(s) at risk of material misstatement and the components of the audit risk model affected for each account identified.
(b) Identify how the audit plan will be affected and recommend specific audit procedures to address the risks associated with each account identified.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENGAGEMENT SELECTION MEMO

The purpose of this form is to document the review team’s understanding of the reviewed firm’s structure, its accounting and auditing practice, and its system of quality control. Based on the risk factors noted, the team captain will select engagements to be reviewed to reduce peer review risk to an acceptable level.

Peer review risk consists of two parts:

  1. The risk (consisting of inherent risk and control risk) that an engagement will not be performed and/or reported on in conformity with applicable professional standards in all materials respects, that the reviewed firm’s system of quality control will not prevent such failure, or both.
  2. The risk (detection risk) that the review team will fail to detect and report on design and/or compliance deficiencies or significant deficiencies in the reviewed firm’s system of quality control.

INHERENT RISK FACTORS

  1. Circumstances arising within the firm:-
  2. Circumstances outside the firm:-
  3. Variances that may occur during the year:-

CONTROL RISK FACTORS

  1. The size of the firm’s major engagement(s), relative to the firm’s practice as a whole
  2. Any initial engagements and their impact on the firm’s practice as a whole
  3. The industries in which the firm’s client base operate, especially any industry concentrations
  4. The risk level of the engagements performed

PEER REVIEW RISK, DETECTION RISK, AND ENGAGEMENT SELECTION

The higher the combined inherent and control risk, the higher the peer review risk. The review team assessed the combined inherent and control risk as [low, moderate, high] SELECT ONE, therefore, peer review risk is assessed as [low, moderate, high] SELECT ONE. A higher peer review risk indicates the scope of the peer review MUST BE INCREASED to keep detection risk acceptably low.

Please note that even when the combined assessed levels are low, the peer review team must review some engagements to obtain reasonable assurance that the reviewed firm is complying with its quality control policies and procedures and applicable professional standards. For the review team to obtain such assurance, a reasonable cross section of the reviewed firm’s accounting and auditing engagements must be reviewed or inspected, with greater emphasis on those portions of the practice with higher combined assessed levels of inherent and control risk.

With peer review risk assessed as [low, moderate, high] SELECT ONE, the following engagements were selected for review in order to reduce detection risk to an acceptably low level. Based on the above inherent and control risk assessment, these engagements represent a reasonable cross section of the reviewed firm’s accounting and auditing engagements, with greater emphasis on those portions of the practice with higher combined assessed levels of inherent and control risk.

RISK FACTORS AFFECTING THE AUDIT RISK

Engagement Risk

  1. Risk auditors incur by being associated with a particular client
  2. Risk is high whenever there is increased likelihood that
    1. Auditor is associated with a failed client
    2. Financial statements contain material misstatement that the auditor fails to find
  3. These conditions increase the likelihood that the auditor will be sued

Client Acceptance or Retention Decision

  1. Perhaps the most important audit decision
  2. A number of factors affect this decision, but most important involve
    1. Quality of the client's corporate governance
    2. Client's financial health

Corporate Governance & Client Acceptance

  1. The key factors an auditor will analyze include
  2. Management integrity
  3. Independence and competence of the audit committee and board
  4. Quality of ERM and controls
  5. Regulatory and reporting requirements
  6. Participation of key stakeholders
  7. Existence of related party transactions

Financial Health of the Organization

There are a number of reasons why the auditor needs to evaluate a potential client's financial health:

  1. The auditor will most likely be sued if a client declares bankruptcy
    1. Investors and creditors who have lost money will look for recovery
    2. Attorneys will claim the financial statements were misstated and the auditors should have known they were misstated
  2. The auditor also needs to understand the financial health in order to:
    1. Assess management's motivation to misstate the financial statements
    2. Identify areas that are likely to be misstated
    3. Identify account balances that appear unusual

Factors Affecting Engagement Risk

The auditor should evaluate the company's economic prospects to help ensure that

  1. Important areas will be investigated
  2. The company will likely stay in business

High-risk companies are generally characterized by

  1. Inadequate capital
  2. Lack of long-run strategic and operational plans
  3. Low cost entry into the market
  4. Dependence on limited product offerings
  5. Dependence on technology subject to obsolescence
  6. Instability of future cash flows
  7. History of questionable accounting practices
  8. Previous inquiries by the SEC or other regulatory agencies

Financial Reporting Risk

Financial reporting risk is influenced by

  1. The company's financial health
  2. The quality of the company's internal controls
  3. The complexity of the company's transactions and financial reporting
  4. Management's motivation to misstate the financial statements

These factors are interrelated

The auditor will gather information on these issues through reviews of previous audits, or by talking with the predecessor auditor

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
You are an Audit Senior currently planning the 30 June 20X8 audit of Forest Limited, an...
You are an Audit Senior currently planning the 30 June 20X8 audit of Forest Limited, an Australian-owned company that produces and exports woodchips to Japan. Forest’s operations are located in Eden, on the far south coast of NSW. Timber is purchased from forests nearby, processed into woodchips and immediately stockpiled for export at the company’s shipyards at Twofold Bay. Forest contracts timber cutters to deliver set tonnages of logs to its mill throughout the year. Woodchips are transported to Japan...
You are an Audit Senior on the AUDIO Health Limited (AUDIO) audit engagement for the financial...
You are an Audit Senior on the AUDIO Health Limited (AUDIO) audit engagement for the financial year ending 30 June 2019. AUDIO specialises in the design and manufacture of implantable hearing aids and invests more than twice the industry average in research and development. While undertaking audit planning procedures you become aware of the following: AUDIO has been developing its latest hearing implant, the X5, for a number of years. AUDIO has invested heavily in research and development of the...
You are an audit senior of Charania & Amlani CPA’s and you are planning the audit...
You are an audit senior of Charania & Amlani CPA’s and you are planning the audit of your client, Bravo Bags Inc. (BBI) which manufactures backpacks and luggage. The year end for BBI was December 31, 2020. Bravo Bags Inc. purchases most of its raw materials from suppliers in China and these goods are shipped directly to the company’s warehouse and the goods are usually in transit for up to four weeks. During the year, BBI spent $1.3 million on...
QUESTION 7: AUDIT PROCEDURES & SAMPLING You are an audit senior working on planning for Targi...
QUESTION 7: AUDIT PROCEDURES & SAMPLING You are an audit senior working on planning for Targi Ltd, a wholesaler of household goods. The company has a 31 December year-end and closes for Christmas from 15 December to 15 January. Consider the following audit objectives and supplementary information on each and answer the questions that appear in the “Required” below them. 1. Audit Objective: Ensure all sales transactions for the period have been recorded. Supplementary Information: A large number of sales...
Eagle Sawmill Limited (Eagle) operates a timber sawmill in a large regional town. It sources its...
Eagle Sawmill Limited (Eagle) operates a timber sawmill in a large regional town. It sources its raw material (pine logs) from a number of local growers and from its own plantations. Logs are transported on large trucks that are weighed in on the company’s weighbridge and weighed out after dropping their loads in the storage area. Logs are then debarked and sawn to size in the cutting area of the mill. The various logs are then sent to other areas...
Section 1: Subsidiary 1 – Carpets International (USA) Limited You are involved in the audit of...
Section 1: Subsidiary 1 – Carpets International (USA) Limited You are involved in the audit of Carpets International (USA) Limited, a subsidiary company of Las Vegas Group Corporation (USA) Limited. The client has presented you with the following draft Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Financial Performance as follows: Unaudited 11 months 30/11/X2 $’000 Audited 12 months 31/12/X1 $’000 Current Assets Cash 58 73 Receivables 4579 3928 Inventories 3624 2047 Total Current Assets 8261 6048 Non-current Assets Property, plant...
CASE 1 You are the internal audit senior responsible for conducting an assurance engagement of the...
CASE 1 You are the internal audit senior responsible for conducting an assurance engagement of the XYZ Company payroll process. This process has not been audited for three years and, as such, is due in the normal audit cycle. There have been no significant changes since the previous audit, that is, there were no system changes, no reorganization of personnel, and no substantive procedural changes. However, during the last assurance engagement, the internal audit function identified several observations, some of...
You are in charge of the audit of Enron Electric Limited (EEL), a subsidiary company of...
You are in charge of the audit of Enron Electric Limited (EEL), a subsidiary company of Las Vegas Group Corporation (USA) Limited. Enron Electric Ltd., is a manufacturer and distributor of household electrical products. The EEL Company contains a number of subsidiaries with diverse operations. A new graduate has also been assigned to assist you on the job. During discussions with management, the graduate has become aware of the following matters: A).          EEL has bank borrowings totaling $2m. As part...
You are the internal audit senior responsible for conducting an assurance engagement of the XYZ Company payroll process.
You are the internal audit senior responsible for conducting an assurance engagement of the XYZ Company payroll process. This process has not been audited for three years and, as such, is due in the normal audit cycle. There have been no significant changes since the previous audit, that is, there were no system changes, no reorganization of personnel, and no substantive procedural changes. However, during the last assurance engagement, the internal audit function identified several observations, some of which were...
Background You are a manager in the audit division at Miller Yates Howarth (MYH), an accounting...
Background You are a manager in the audit division at Miller Yates Howarth (MYH), an accounting firm with offices throughout the major regional centres of NSW and Queensland. Although a medium sized firm by national standards, MYH is the second largest regional accounting firm in Australia. Most of MYH’s audit clients are in the agriculture, mining, manufacturing and property industries. All of those industries are currently under pressure, either from a downturn in commodity prices or fierce competition from overseas...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT