Question

I don't understand how to allocate costs by net realizable value, relative sizes value, and by...

I don't understand how to allocate costs by net realizable value, relative sizes value, and by weight. The question is one that you have online but it is obviously wrong! Could you please explain how to allocate? The question is :

The Parvis Paramount Pigsty (PPP) raises pigs, from which a variety of pork products are processed. The herd features the Danish Yorkshire, which typically reaches 105 kgs at maturity. The following table summarizes the production process of producing Porktry, Porfekt, and Porkatoo from one pig.

Previous research has indicated that raising a Danish Yorkshire from breeding to disposition costs an average of €3 per kg. The ratio of pig parts to products is relatively inflexible; as yet, bio-engineering has failed to produce pigs with other than four legs. Of the statements below, which is true of the allocation of the joint costs?

Weight in kgs: Porktry 45 Porfekt 20 Porkatoo 35

Sale Price, kg porktry 22.50 euros Porfekt 84.00 euros Porkatoo 28.00 euros

Processing costs per kg: Porktry 6.75 euros Porfekt 25.20 euros Porkatoo 7.00 euros

A. By weight, Porktry is allocated € 81.41

B. By relative sales value, Porkatoo is allocated € 80.05

C. Since Porktry is the least profitable product, it should be discontinued and resources devoted to Porfekt

D. By relative net realizable values, Porfekt is allocated € 135.09

E. None of the above

PLEASE DO NOT JUST GIVE ANSWER... Giving the answer isn't even necessary...just please explain how I allocate according to weight, relative sales value, and net realizeable values!

Thank you!

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Joint cost = 105 * 3 = 315

Product = Porktry,Porkfekt,Porkatoo

(Note : INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT/TOTAL * 315 means for example 45/100 * 315 for weight or 708.75/2619.75 * 315 for each of the three products)

SR NO ALLOCATION OF JOINT COSTS PORKTRY PORFEKT PORKATOO TOTAL
1. WEIGHT 45 20 35 100
ALLOCATION=INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT/TOTAL * 315 141.75 63 110.25 315
2. SALE PRICE PER KG 22.5 84 28 -
TOTAL SALES(WEIGHT*SALE PRICE) 1012.5 1680 980 3672.5
ALLOCATION=INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT/TOTAL * 315 86.84 144.10 84.06 315
3. NET REALIZABLE VALUE:-
SALE PRICE PER KG 22.5 84 28 -
LESS:PROCESSING COST PER KG 6.75 25.2 7 -
NET REALIZABLE VALUE PER KG 15.75 58.8 21 -
TOTAL NET REALIZABLE VALUE (NRV PER KG * WEIGHT) 708.75 1176 735 2619.75
ALLOCATION=INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT/TOTAL * 315 85.22 141.40 88.38 315

Answer is E. None of the above

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Allocating Joint Costs Using the Net Realizable Value Method A company manufactures three products, L-Ten, Triol,...
Allocating Joint Costs Using the Net Realizable Value Method A company manufactures three products, L-Ten, Triol, and Pioze, from a joint process. Each production run costs $12,000. None of the products can be sold at split-off, but must be processed further. Information on one batch of the three products is as follows: Product         Gallons Further Processing Cost per Gallon Eventual Market Price per Gallon L-Ten         3,000 $0.60   $2.20   Triol         3,500 0.90 4.90 Pioze         2,200 1.60 6.90...
Physical Units Method, Relative Sales-Value-at-Split-off Method, Net Realizable Value Method, Decision Making Sonimad Sawmill, Inc. (SSI),...
Physical Units Method, Relative Sales-Value-at-Split-off Method, Net Realizable Value Method, Decision Making Sonimad Sawmill, Inc. (SSI), purchases logs from independent timber contractors and processes them into the following three types of lumber products: Studs for residential construction (e.g., walls and ceilings) Decorative pieces (e.g., fireplace mantels and beams for cathedral ceilings) Posts used as support braces (e.g., mine support braces and braces for exterior fences around ranch properties) These products are the result of a joint sawmill process that involves...
Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...
Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 15,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $20,000; unders, $23,040. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated...