Question

Question 2 – Income Derek is a police officer in Auckland. His house is located on...

Question 2 – Income

Derek is a police officer in Auckland. His house is located on a large corner site on a main street, which provides good exposure to passing traffic. He was approached by a heat
pump company who offered him two heat pumps plus installation of the pumps in his house free of charge, in exchange for allowing the house to be used in a marketing campaign. The value of the heat pumps including installation was $4,500. The agreement required a sign to be erected on the outside fence of Derek’s house.

As part of the agreement, the house was also used in a television commercial which featured Derek enjoying a home warmed by heat pump. The heat pump company paid Derek $ 2,000 for the commercial.

During the same year he purchased a pearl necklace for $6,000 intending to give this to his girlfriend for her birthday but a month after the purchase his girlfriend broke up with him and he enrolled in a course about making jewellery. Using the new skills, he has learned, Derek broke up the necklace and set each pearl into a separate ring. He spent $200 on ring mounts and settings and sold all the rings for $11,000.

Required:

Discuss whether (a) the value of the heat pumps and installation, (b) the $2,000 payment for commercial and (c) $11,000 for sale of rings is assessable income to Derek. Support your discussions with references to the Income Tax Act 2007 and appropriate case law.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a. The value of the heat pumps and installation is assessable income because it is the benefit received by Derek for alloeing his house to be used in a marketing campaign.

b. $2000 payment for commercial is assessable income for Derek as it is paid to him for services rendered by him.

c. Only $11000-$6000-$200 = $4800 is assessable income for Derek in case of sale of rings because expenditure is tob e deducted from the gross proceeds received to arrive at the assessable income.
Though initially the pearl necklace was bought for personal use, later it was used for business purpose. So, $6000 spent on pearl necklace should be considered as expenditure.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT