A
couple bought a two family house in 1998 for $100,000, the house is
now worth and valued at $850,000. The house sold for $800,000
leaving a gain of $700,000. Following the 1031 Exchange, the couple
would get back their original 1998 investment of $100,000 tax-free.
With the 1031 Exchange, the couple needs to purchase a secondary
home to replace their original 1998 investment at the equal or
greater amount of $100,000. If the couple buys a replacement
secondary home for $100,000, (after closing costs of $30,000
leaving a net gain of $670,000 ($700,000-$30,000)) would be sent to
a qualified intermediary. The couples accountant says that as long
as the replacement secondary home is rented out for a year, the
qualified intermediary holds the net gain of the sale for a year,
the couple will avoid capital costs. Is the couples accountant
correct or incorrect? Would the couple have to find a replacement
home at the equal or greater value of their original 1998 $100,000
investment or would the replacement secondary home have to be at
the equal or greater value of the net gain of $670,000?