Question

Problem On January 1, Year 1, G and L form a limited partnership to acquire and...

Problem

On January 1, Year 1, G and L form a limited partnership to acquire and operate a rental apartment building. L, the limited partner, contributes $90 and G, the general partner, $10. The partnership obtains a nonrecourse loan from an unrelated financial institution for $900 and purchases a building (on leased land) for $1,000. The loan is secured by the building. The loan requires interest to be paid currently, but does not call for any principal payment for 5 years. The building is depreciable over 10 years at the rate of $100 per year.

The partnership agreement contains the following provisions:

1. The agreement satisfies the alternate test for economic effect under § 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d), i.e., it contains the requisite provisions for capital account maintenance and distribution of liquidation proceeds. Although G has a deficit makeup obligation L does not, but the agreement includes a “QIO” provision.

2. The agreement includes a "minimum gain chargeback" provision that complies with § 1.704-2(f).

3. All income and loss, other than nonrecourse deductions, are allocated 90% to L and 10% to G until the first time that the partnership recognizes income and gain that exceed losses sustained in prior years. Thereafter, all income, gain and loss are allocated 50% to G and 50% to L.

4. Nonrecourse deductions are allocated 80% to L and 20% to G.

5. Non-liquidating cash distributions are divided 10% to G and 90% to L until they have each recovered their initial capital contributions (i.e., $10 to G and $90 to L). Thereafter, all non-liquidating cash distributions are to be shared 50%-50%.

For the taxable Years 1, 2 and 3, the partnership has rental income of $70, operating expenses of $10, interest expense of $60, and a cost recovery deduction of $100, for a net loss of $100. 18

Questions:

(a) Is the 80/20 split of nonrecourse deductions permissible? How much flexibility do G and L have to allocate partnership nonrecourse deductions? Specifically, which of the following would be permissible?

G L

(i) 50% 50%

(ii) 10% 90%

(iii) 1% 99%

(b) Assume that on January 1, Year 4 the partnership defaults on the mortgage and transfers the building (then worth $600) to the lender by deed in lieu of foreclosure, and liquidates. What are the appropriate tax allocations and cash distributions to G and L for Years 1 through 4?

(c) What if, instead, on January 1 Year 4, the partnership sells the building for $1,100 and liquidates. What are the appropriate tax allocations and distributions to G and L?

(d) What if, instead, in Year 3, the partnership borrows an additional $100, using the building as security, and distributes the cash to the partners in the ratio of 10/90, in accordance with the partnership agreement. What is the aggregate partnership minimum gain at the end of the year, and what is each partner’s share of PMG? If the partnership then sells the building on January 1, Year 4, what are the appropriate allocations and distributions?

For purposes of parts (e) and (f), assume that the partners share nonrecourse deductions in the same proportions that they share all other income and deductions, i.e., 90% to L and 10% to G until the first time that the partnership recognizes income and gain that exceed losses sustained in prior years, thereafter,50/50.

(e) What if in part (c) instead of selling the building in Year 4, the partnership continues to operate throughout Year 4, during which it earns gross income of $700, prior to taking into account depreciation for Year 4. It then sells the building on January 1, Year 5 and liquidates. What are the appropriate allocations and distributions?

(f) Suppose that in part (c) on January 1, Year 3, G and L contribute cash to the partnership in the amounts of $20 and $180, respectively, and the partnership uses these contributions to reduce the balance of the mortgage from $900 to $700. What tax consequences occur in Year 3 as a result of these transactions?

(g) What difference would it make in part (a) if G had guaranteed the original $900 loan to the lender?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a) Nonrecourse deductions are allocated 80% to L and 20% to G. In case of non recourse deduction, there is no adjustment mentioned in agreement. based on the other criteria, it may execused till 50:50 ratio

b)Non-liquidating cash distributions are divided 10% to G and 90% to L until they have each recovered their initial capital contributions (i.e., $10 to G and $90 to L). Thereafter, all non-liquidating cash distributions are to be shared 50%-50%.

c) 50% : 50%

d) The result may be loss & it is share at 10% by G & 90% by L

e) The allocation after exeeding the existing loss, profit will be shared by 50% to 50%. The situation gain after considering depreaciation also and at the time of liquidation the gain will be distributed at 50:50

f) It may decrease the interest expenses & the contribution by the partners may results to gain and it will be shared by 50:50 ratio

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
reat West Boating Ventures is a limited partnership formed to purchase and operate a fishing boat....
reat West Boating Ventures is a limited partnership formed to purchase and operate a fishing boat. The partnership was formed by two partners, I and L, who each contributed $150,000 cash to form the partnership. The partnership then borrowed $800,000 on a nonrecourse loan from an unrelated bank, and purchased a boat. The two partners share all items of partnership income, gain, loss and deduction equally. a. Over the partnership’s first 3 years of operations, it reported net losses of...
Krypton Partnership owns and operates an office building in the medical district of a large city....
Krypton Partnership owns and operates an office building in the medical district of a large city. The property was contributed to the partnership several years ago by partner K. Under the terms of the partnership agreement, K is allocated 20% of the partnership’s profits, gains, losses and deductions, other than depreciation. Depreciation is allocated 50% to K and 50% to the other partners. The office building is encumbered by a nonrecourse mortgage of $750,000. Its tax basis is $650,000 and...
The January 1, 2017, balance sheet of the partnership of Linda Kingston and Jeannette Allen is...
The January 1, 2017, balance sheet of the partnership of Linda Kingston and Jeannette Allen is shown below. Assets Liabilities and Capital Cash $12,000 Liabilities $34,000 Other assets 108,000 Capital - Kingston 35,600 Capital - Allen 50,400 Total assets $120,000 Total liabilities and capital $120,000 The partnership reported revenues of $48,000 and expenses of $33,000 for 2017. Neither partner withdrew funds from the partnership during the year. Kingston invested $4,800 in the firm on June 28, 2017. (c) The partnership...
Kerry is a partner in the Kerry, Davis, Smith & Jones Partnership. Kerry owned 25% from...
Kerry is a partner in the Kerry, Davis, Smith & Jones Partnership. Kerry owned 25% from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, when he bought Jones’s 25% interest. He owned 50% for the rest of the year. The partnership had ordinary income of $189,800 and $5,000 in long-term capital gains. Barring any special allocations in a partnership agreement, what is Kerry’s share of income Oridinary Income- LTCG-
3. On January 1 of the current year, Anna and Jason form an equal partnership. Anna...
3. On January 1 of the current year, Anna and Jason form an equal partnership. Anna contributes $50,000 cash and a parcel of land (adjusted basis of $200,000; fair market value of $150,000) in exchange for her interest in the partnership. Jason contributes property (adjusted basis of $180,000; fair market value of $200,000) in exchange for his partnership interest. Which of the following statements is true concerning the income tax results of this partnership formation? a. Jason recognizes a $20,000...
Anthony Commonplace and Billie Campus have agreed to form a cash-basis general partnership, Live-It-Up Partners, to...
Anthony Commonplace and Billie Campus have agreed to form a cash-basis general partnership, Live-It-Up Partners, to own and operate apartment complexes in Universityville, USA. As of January 1, 20X4, the partnership takes legal title to the contributed property and commences operations. At the time of formation, Anthony contributed $280,000 cash and an apartment complex, Late Night Apts, valued at $2 million. Anthony purchased the complex on April 12, 20X1 for $1.6 million dollars and has been operating the property as...
The December 31, 2019 balance sheet of the LCM Limited Partnership appears below:                             &nbs
The December 31, 2019 balance sheet of the LCM Limited Partnership appears below:                                                             Adjusted           Fair Market                                                               Basis                  Value Cash                                                     $210,000          $210,000 Receivables                                                        0            108,000 Property, Plant & Equipment                     42,000              81,000                                                             $252,000          $399,000 Larry, Capital                                        $  84,000          $133,000 Curly, Capital                                            84,000            133,000 Moe, Capital                                             84,000            133,000                                                             $252,000          $399,000 Each partner shares equally in the partnership’s capital, income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits.  The partnership manufactures high-quality widgets and capital is a material income-producing factor.  On December 31, 2019, Curly, the General Partner, receives a distribution of $140,000 cash in retirement of his partnership interest. Nothing is stated in the partnership...
Grace, James, Helen, and Charles each own equal interests in GJHC Partnership, a calendar year-end, cash-method...
Grace, James, Helen, and Charles each own equal interests in GJHC Partnership, a calendar year-end, cash-method entity. On January 1 of the current year, James’s basis in his partnership interest is $62,000. For the taxable year, the partnership generates $80,000 of ordinary income and $30,000 of dividend income. For the first five months of the year, GJHC generates $25,000 of ordinary income and no dividend income. On June 1, James sells his partnership interest to Robert for a cash payment...
The partnership agreement of the G&P general partnership states that Gary will receive a guaranteed payment...
The partnership agreement of the G&P general partnership states that Gary will receive a guaranteed payment of $17,400, and that Gary and Prudence will share the remaining profits or losses in a 45/55 ratio. For year 1, the G&P partnership reports the following results: Sales revenue $ 90,200 Gain on sale of land (§1231) $ 7,300 Cost of goods sold $ (46,700 ) Depreciation—MACRS $ (14,500 ) Employee wages $ (20,000 ) Cash charitable contributions $ (5,600 ) Municipal bond...
Allison, Keesha, and Steven each own equal interests in KAS Partnership, a calendar year-end, cash-method entity....
Allison, Keesha, and Steven each own equal interests in KAS Partnership, a calendar year-end, cash-method entity. On January 1 of the current year, Steven’s basis in his partnership interest is $32,500. During January and February, the partnership generates $37,260 of ordinary income and $6,216 of tax-exempt income. On March 1, Steven sells his partnership interest to Juan for a cash payment of $57,100. The partnership has the following assets and no liabilities at the sale date: Tax Basis FMV Cash...