Question

"Variable costs are always relevant, and fixed costs are always irrelevant". Do you agree? Why?

"Variable costs are always relevant, and fixed costs are always irrelevant". Do you agree? Why?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Before reaching at any conclusion firstly we need to understand what is relevent cost, so the relevant cost is a cost which  can change the decision of a user or management, relevent cost change with the change in decision of Management.

Therefore now we can conclude that since fixed cost also play a very vital role in costing or in decision making and it is one of the major expense in any organisation which can influence/change the decision of the management. Therefore fixed cost are not always irrelevant.

I hope this clear your doubt. Feel free to comment if you still have any query or need something else. I'll help asap. Do give a thumbs up if you find this helpful.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Fixed costs are always relevant costs in decisions. TRUE OR FALSE
Fixed costs are always relevant costs in decisions. TRUE OR FALSE
Which of the following costs are always irrelevant in decision making? A. sunk costs B. opportunity...
Which of the following costs are always irrelevant in decision making? A. sunk costs B. opportunity costs C. fixed costs D. avoidable costs
Relevant Costs in Short-Term Decision Making Your friend is also in this same class. He says,...
Relevant Costs in Short-Term Decision Making Your friend is also in this same class. He says, “The topic on relevant costs is easy……..all you have to know is that variable costs are always relevant, and fixed costs are always irrelevant.” REQUIRED: Is his statement about variable costs correct? (Answer Yes or No) Is his statement about fixed costs correct? (Answer Yes or No) Provide one example to support your answer concerning variable costs in #1 Provide one example to support...
“Higher bank capital is always a good thing.” Do you agree with this statement? Why or...
“Higher bank capital is always a good thing.” Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
In 150 words or fewer, explain the difference between relevant costs, irrelevant costs, and sunk costs.
In 150 words or fewer, explain the difference between relevant costs, irrelevant costs, and sunk costs.
Describe sunk costs. Why are sunk costs irrelevant in decision making? Give an example of a...
Describe sunk costs. Why are sunk costs irrelevant in decision making? Give an example of a fixed cost that is not sunk, but is still irrelevant.
Changes in fixed costs are much more significant to a company than changes in variable costs....
Changes in fixed costs are much more significant to a company than changes in variable costs. Do you agree? Explain
4. J. P. Alexander claims that the relevant range concept is important only for variable costs....
4. J. P. Alexander claims that the relevant range concept is important only for variable costs. a. Explain the relevant range concept. b. Do you agree with J. P.'s claim? Explain.
Why, in general, are fixed costs not relevant in short term decision making?
Why, in general, are fixed costs not relevant in short term decision making?
Irrelevant costs are costs that do not affect short−term decisions.
Irrelevant costs are costs that do not affect short−term decisions.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT