Question

Mandatory arbitration agreements in Title VII cases:

Multiple Choice

• are supported by both the EEOC and the Supreme Court.

• are opposed by both the EEOC and the Supreme Court

• are supported by the EEOC but opposed by the Supreme Court.

• are opposed by the EEOC but supported by the Supreme Court.

Answer 1

Answer - Option four is correct.mandatory arbitation agreements in the title VII cases are opposed by the EEOC but supported by the supreme court.

EEOC continues to be fully available to employees as an avenue to assert EEO rights and to investigate in the public interest,regardless of wheather the parties have entered into an enforceable arbitation agreement.

In 1991, the supreme court explained that an arbitration agreement did not preclued an individuals right to file a charge and have the case investigated by the EECO.