On January 1, 2016, Nobel Corporation acquired machinery at a cost of $1,600,000. Nobel adopted the straight-line method of depreciation for this machine and had been recording depreciation over an estimated life of ten years, with no residual value. At the beginning of 2019, a decision was made to change to the double-declining balance method of depreciation for this machine.
Assuming a 30% tax rate, the cumulative effect of this accounting change on beginning retained earnings, is:
Select one:
A. $179,200
B. $0
C. $210,560
D. $300,800.
Ernst Company purchased equipment that cost $3,000,000 on January 1, 2017. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The equipment had a nine-year life and a $120,000 residual value. Ernst uses the straight-line method to account for depreciation expense. The error was discovered on December 10, 2019. Ernst is subject to a 40% tax rate.
Ernst's net income for the year ended December 31, 2017, was understated by:
Select one:
A. $1,608,000
B. $1,800,000
C. $2,680,000
D. $3,000,000.
Ans Option B $0 | |||||||||||||
As there is change in method of depreciation from straight line method to double declining method so there is no effect retrospectively. | |||||||||||||
There is no cumulative effect as the change will have effect prospectively. | |||||||||||||
ans | |||||||||||||
the income will be understated by | |||||||||||||
(Cost-Deprection expense as per SLM)*1-tax rate | |||||||||||||
($3000000-((3000000-120000)/9))*(100%-40%) | 1608000 | ||||||||||||
correct option | |||||||||||||
Option A $1608000 | |||||||||||||
If any doubt please comment. If satisfied please rate |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.