Ruth invested $100,000 in the Doing Great partnership. The partnership is now being liquidated and Ruth has a deficit balance of $30,000. Which of the following statement is true?
Ruth responsibility and loss is constrained to the original $100,000 investment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth is responsible to pay the partnership additional $30,000, even if she would need to sell her personal assets in order to afford this payment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth should cover her deficit only if she can easily afford it. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth is legally required to declare personal bankruptcy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth should initiate legal proceedings against the partnership. Paris Corporation owns 70% of London Corporation, and 24% of Rome Corporation. London Corporation owns 30% of Rome Corporation. When Paris prepared its consolidated financial statements, it should include:
|
Answers are as follows:
1. Ruth is responsible to pay the partnership additional $30,000, even if she would need to sell her personal assets in order to afford this payment.
2. London but not Rome because London corporation is controlled (More than 51 % holding) by the Paris corporation. In case of Rome corporation the Paris corporation is having significance influence but not control (Less than 50 % indirect holding).
3. Partners’ capital beginning balances on the schedule of liquidation (after taking into account partners loans) will be as follows
Eva 8,000; Debora 55,000; Alice 87,000;
Eva (58000-50000) = 8000
Debora = 55000
Alice (40000+47000) = 87000
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.