Question

For franchise tax purposes, apportionment of NY receipts is based on a three-factor formula looking at...

For franchise tax purposes, apportionment of NY receipts is based on a three-factor formula looking at the payroll, business receipts and real property of the foreign corporation.
True or False

Homework Answers

Answer #1

True

Nonresident partners use three-factor apportionment, the receipts factor sources all receipts to the location of the partnership’s sole office in New York, and the property and payroll factors are also both 100% New York.

So, this is true in cases of Non-resident partners.

Hope this meets your purpose.

Kindly Like the answer if it was helpful. This motivates the experts.

Thanks.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
In general, income for corporation business tax purposes is divided into two categories: business income and...
In general, income for corporation business tax purposes is divided into two categories: business income and nonbusiness income. Business income is apportioned to a state by use of a formula while nonbusiness income is allocated to a particular state. Business income includes income from transactions and activity in the regular course of a taxpayer's trade or business. Nonbusiness income is all income other than business income (interest, dividends, capital gains).  (Some states apportion all income). Molly Corporation realized $1.5 million of...
Subject: Business Tax Brood Corporation realized $1.5 million of taxable income from the sales of its...
Subject: Business Tax Brood Corporation realized $1.5 million of taxable income from the sales of its products in States A and B. Both states employ a three-factor apportionment formula that equally weights sales, property, and payroll. Brood’s gross sales, payroll, and property attributable to or located in the states are shown below. Based on this data, determine the tax liability for State A and State B, and the total effective tax rate. State A State B Totals Gross Sales $2,000,000...
Subject: Business Tax Brood Corporation realized $1.5 million of taxable income from the sales of its...
Subject: Business Tax Brood Corporation realized $1.5 million of taxable income from the sales of its products in States A and B. Both states employ a three-factor apportionment formula that equally weights sales, property, and payroll. Brood’s gross sales, payroll, and property attributable to or located in the states are shown below. Based on this data, determine the tax liability for State A and State B, and the total effective tax rate. State A State B Totals Gross Sales $2,000,000...
True Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Trumaine Corporation, generated a $400,000 taxable loss in its...
True Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Trumaine Corporation, generated a $400,000 taxable loss in its first year of operations. True's activities and sales are restricted to State A, which imposes an 8% income tax. In the same year, Trumaine's taxable income is $1,000,000. Trumaine's activities and sales are restricted to State B, which imposes an 11% income tax. Both states use a three-factor apportionment formula that equally weights sales, payroll, and property, and both require a unitary group to...
Palmetto Corporation realized $300,000 of taxable income from the sales of its products in States A...
Palmetto Corporation realized $300,000 of taxable income from the sales of its products in States A and B. Palmetto's activities in both states establish nexus for income tax purposes. Palmetto's sales, payroll, and property in the states include the following: State A State B Total Sales $540,000 $260,000 $800,000 Property $155,000 $0 $155,000 Payroll $285,000 $0 $285,000 State B uses a sales-factor-only apportionment formula. In your computations, round any division to three decimal places before converting to a percentage and...
1) Jo is a Canadian citizen. In March of 2020, Jo's employer transferred Jo to the...
1) Jo is a Canadian citizen. In March of 2020, Jo's employer transferred Jo to the United States. Jo's spouse and child moved with Jo at that time. Jo chose not to sell the family's home, and instead, now lends it to extended family from overseas during the winter months. Jo has five weeks of vacation each summer, at which time the family returns to Canada and stay in their house. Jo did not cancel a long-standing country club membership,...
Tax Preparation Problem Use the following information to complete Phillip and Claire Dunphy’s 2016 federal income...
Tax Preparation Problem Use the following information to complete Phillip and Claire Dunphy’s 2016 federal income tax return. If information is missing, use reasonable assumptions to fill in the gaps. Ignore the alternative minimum tax for this problem. Any required forms, schedules, and instructions can be found at the IRS website (www.irs.gov). The instructions can be helpful in completing the forms. Facts: Phillip and Claire are married and file a joint return. Phillip is self-employed as a real estate agent,...
Note: This problem is for the 2018 tax year. David R. and Ella M. Cole (ages...
Note: This problem is for the 2018 tax year. David R. and Ella M. Cole (ages 39 and 38, respectively) are husband and wife who live at 1820 Elk Avenue, Denver, CO 80202. David is a self-employed consultant specializing in retail management, and Ella is a dental hygienist for a chain of dental clinics. David earned consulting fees of $145,000 in 2018. He maintains his own office and pays for all business expenses. The Coles are adequately covered by the...
Instructions: Please complete the 2017 federal income tax return for Magdalena Schmitz. Ignore the requirement to...
Instructions: Please complete the 2017 federal income tax return for Magdalena Schmitz. Ignore the requirement to attach the form(s) W-2 to the front page of the Form 1040. If required information is missing, use reasonable assumptions to fill in the gaps. Make sure you include all necessary schedules and tax forms. Magdalena Schmitz has undergone some major changes in her life recently. In 2015, at the age of 46, her husband, Roger, passed away. Magdalena has not remarried as of...
Why do you suppose the marketing of the tax shelters at KPMG grew so fast? a.Transformational...
Why do you suppose the marketing of the tax shelters at KPMG grew so fast? a.Transformational leadership b. Moral manager c. Social learning theory d. Moral intensity [The following information applies to the question.] In Chapter 4 we discussed the artificial tax shelter arrangements developed by KPMG LLP for wealthy clients that led to the settlement of a legal action with the Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. On August 29, 2005, KPMG admitted to criminal wrongdoing and...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT