Question

The Company believes that there are no compliance issues associated with applicable environmental laws and regulations...

The Company believes that there are no compliance issues associated with applicable environmental laws and regulations
that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also remediating environmental contamination
resulting from past industrial activity at certain of its sites. Expenditures for remediation and environmental liabilities were $11 million
in 2016, and are estimated at $44 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 through 2021. These amounts do not consider potential
recoveries from other parties. The Company has taken an active role in identifying and accruing for these costs and in management’s opinion,
the liabilities for all environmental matters that are probable and reasonably estimable have been accrued and totaled $83 million and $109
million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These liabilities are undiscounted, do not consider potential recoveries from
other parties and will be paid out over the periods of remediation for the applicable sites, which are expected to occur primarily over the next 15 years.
Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters, or the ultimate costs of remediation, management does not
believe that any reasonably possible expenditures that may be incurred in excess of the liabilities accrued should exceed $64 million in the aggregate.
Management also does not believe that these expenditures should result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of

operations, liquidity, or capital resources for any year.

a.How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are probable and reasonably estimable? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities?

b.How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are reasonably possible? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities?

c.The footnote mentions $83 million and $44 million as estimated future expenditures. Explain what each of these amounts represents and why they differ.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a. Merck will accrue the environment liabilities that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2016 Merck has an amount of $83 million of these environment liabilities.

b. Merck will not accrue the environment liabilities that are reasonably possible. Merck will disclose about these liabilities in the footnotes. At December 31, 2016 Merck has an amount of $64 million of these environment liabilities.

c. The amount of $83 million will be the total accrual on Merck's balance sheet. The amount of $44 million is the amount that it expects to be paid out in coming five years. The difference of $39 million will be paid after the period of five years has ended.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
AgriBiz Inc. provides chemical, plastic, and agricultural products and services to various consumer markets. The following...
AgriBiz Inc. provides chemical, plastic, and agricultural products and services to various consumer markets. The following excerpt is taken from the disclosure notes of AgriBiz’s 2017 annual report: At December 31, 2017, the Company had accrued obligations of $1,331 million for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $239 million for the remediation of Superfund sites. These obligations are included in "Accrued and other current liabilities" and "Other noncurrent obligations" in the consolidated balance sheets. This is management’s best estimate...
It is now late May 2018 and you, CPA, have just finished meeting with your partner,...
It is now late May 2018 and you, CPA, have just finished meeting with your partner, Ms. Wong. Ms. Wong wants your help with some clients of hers. One client, Garden Supplies Co. (GSC) has had a new shareholder buy shares. Ms. Wong wants you to tell her if GSC is a resident of Canada for tax purposes in 2018 and describe the personal tax consequences that Mrs. Gardiner will have from her 2018 share sale. You can ignore the...
It is now late May 2018 and you, CPA, have just finished meeting with your partner,...
It is now late May 2018 and you, CPA, have just finished meeting with your partner, Ms. Wong. Ms. Wong wants your help with some clients of hers. One client, Garden Supplies Co. (GSC) has had a new shareholder buy shares. Ms. Wong wants you to tell her if GSC is a resident of Canada for tax purposes in 2018 and describe the personal tax consequences that Mrs. Gardiner will have from her 2018 share sale. You can ignore the...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how the firms resources incompetencies support the given pressures regarding costs and local responsiveness. Describe entry modes have they usually used, and whether they are appropriate for the given strategy. Any key issues in their global strategy? casestudy: Atlanta, June 17, 2014. Sea of Delta employees and their families swarmed between food trucks, amusement park booths, and entertainment venues that were scattered throughout what would...