Question

Leyton and Dustin run a service station in a country town, the service station sells petrol and a number of other goods, which are displayed near the cash register and outside the office. Leyton and Dustin are partners in the business, though they have an old written agreement that states that neither will order goods or services over the value of $3,000 unless the contract contains signatures from both partners.

Leyton has been approached by a supplier of magazines who offers the business the delivery of 100 copies of a particular publication each month. Leyton convinced that the magazine is popular and will make some money, signs a contract with a promise to pay $5,000 in instalments for the delivery of the magazines.

The magazines arrive and Dustin is very upset, first because the magazine is quite unsuitable for display in the business and may result in a loss of customers if they see this publication, but he is also upset that Leyton has made an agreement without consulting him. There is an argument between the partners and Leyton takes sick leave and stays at home to recover from the stress of the argument. In the meantime, Dustin communicates with the supplier of the magazines and declares that the agreement to supply the publication is invalid due to a breach of the partnership agreement, and that the magazines will be returned and no payments will be forthcoming from the business.

Explain, with reference to partnership law:

1. Whether Dustin can cancel the contract with supplier of the magazines?         

[Answer here]

2. Whether Dustin can be liable for the actions of Leyton?                  

[Answer here]

Answer 1

a. partnership is a business association of two or more individuals, through which partners share the profits and responsibility for the liabilities of their venture.

In the given case law light on contract with the supplier is outside the ambit of partnership between the leyton and Dustin
This agreement on supplier is made on the name of the firm that is service station hence Dustin can cancel the contract with the supplier of the magazine.
And the contract is void.

b.Dustin can not be liable for the actions of Leyton because the contract is made with suppiler outside the ambit of partnership ( there are specific agreeement that states only $3000 good can be ordered).