Question

1. Which of the following methods allocates joint costs using a measure such as pounds, gallons,...

1. Which of the following methods allocates joint costs using a measure such as pounds, gallons, or inches at the split-off point?

a.weighted average method

b.net realizable value method

c.physical units method

2.

Johnson Lumber Mill produces various grades of cut boards from raw lumber. The costs incurred before the split-off point where the cut boards are separated and processed further are

a.investment center costs

b.new costs that cannot be traced to the various grades of lumber being produced

c.new costs that can be traced to the various grades of lumber being produced

d.joint costs that cannot be separated

3.

Which of the following statements is false about joint manufacturing processes?

a.Companies producing joint products often allocate joint costs to individual products.

b.Joint costs are by definition inseparable.

c.Joint manufacturing processes are simple and rarely require careful attention from managers when analyzing and interpreting product costs that include joint costs.

d.Product costs are more accurate if joint costs are allocated to individual products.

4.

When a single manufacturing process generates multiple outputs, it is called a(n)

a.activity-based manufacturing process

b.joint manufacturing process

c.joint activity manufacturing process

d.multiple output manufacturing process

5.

The weighted average method uses weight factors in conjunction with physical measures because

a.physical units alone are sufficient to provide the most reasonable allocation method

b.the joint process includes a product that requires extra machine time and creates greater wear and tear on the processing machines

c.the market value of the joint process should be weighted more heavily towards one of the products

d.the net realizable value of one product is greater than that of another product made with the same joint process

6.

Using the reciprocal services method, which of the following equations represents the algebraic expressions for the two equations needed to capture the total costs of a Janitorial Department (J) that includes not only $350,000 of direct costs but also 30% of the Maintenance Department (M) cost and the Maintenance Department that includes not only $50,000 of direct costs but also 50% of the Janitorial Department?

a.J = ($350,000 × 0.30) + M and M = ($50,000 × 0.50) + J

b.J = $350,000 – (0.30 × M) and M = $50,000 – (0.50 × J)

c.J = $350,000 + (0.30 × M) and M = $50,000 + (0.50 × J)

d.J = $350,000 + (0.30 ÷ M) and M = $50,000 + (0.50 ÷ J)

7.

Which of the following statements is true about the direct method of allocating support department costs to production departments?

a.The direct method requires that the same cost driver be used for each support department.

b.The direct method allocates all support department costs directly to production departments thus ignoring the possibility that some support departments may also serve other support departments.

c.The direct method is more difficult to use than the sequential method.

d.The direct method allocates only some of the support department costs directly to production departments and is more accurate than the reciprocal services method.

8.

When multiple production department rates are used to apply overhead to products,

a.support department costs are allocated to production departments and then all overhead costs are directly traced to support and production departments

b.all overhead costs are first directly traced to support and production departments and then support department costs are allocated to production departments

c.all manufacturing costs are first directly traced to support and production departments and then support department costs are allocated to production departments

d.only fixed overhead costs are first directly traced to support and production departments and then support department costs are allocated to production departments

9.

Which of the following statements is true about the four common methods for allocating joint costs?

a.It is impossible to determine whether one of the four methods may be more appropriate than another based on the production process.

b.The market value at split-off method is always the least appropriate method for allocating joint costs.

c.None of the methods will consistently allocate joint costs more accurately than another.

d.The net realizable value method is always the least reliable method for allocating joint costs.

d.market value at split-off method

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1.b.net realisation value method

2.c.new cost that can be traced to the various grades of lumber being produced.

3.b.joint costs are by definition inseparable.

4.d.multiple output manufacturing process

5.d.the net reliable value of one product is greater than that of another product made with the same joint process.

6.c.J=$350,000+(0.30*M) and M=$50,000+(0.50*J)

7.b.the direct method allocates all support department costs directly to production departments thus ignoring the possiblity that some support departments may also serve other support departments.

8.a.support department costs are allocated to production departments and then all overhead costs are directly traced to support and production departments.

9.c.none of the methods will consistently allocate joint costs more accurately than another.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1) Which of the following describes who the direct allocation method allocates support?department costs? A. it...
1) Which of the following describes who the direct allocation method allocates support?department costs? A. it allocates each support??department's costs to operating departments only B. it requires managers to rank the support departments in the order that the step?down allocation is to proceed C. it allocates support?department costs to operating departments by fully recognizing the mutual services provided among all support departments D. it allocates support?department costs to other support departments and to operating departments in a sequential manner that...
Sasha Company allocates the estimated $195,300 of its accounting department costs to its production and sales...
Sasha Company allocates the estimated $195,300 of its accounting department costs to its production and sales departments since the accounting department supports the other two departments particularly with regard to payroll and accounts payable functions. The costs will be allocated based on the number of employees using the direct method. Information regarding costs and employees follows: Department Employees Accounting 4 Production 39 Sales 16 How much of the accounting department costs will be allocated to the production?
The final step in all three methods (direct, sequential, and reciprocal services) of allocating $600,000 in...
The final step in all three methods (direct, sequential, and reciprocal services) of allocating $600,000 in support department costs to production departments is to a.allocate support department costs by multiplying the support department costs by the percentage usage of each department. b.determine the usage of the support department cost driver by each department. c.apply production department costs to products. d.directly trace and distribute overhead costs to support and production departments. Which of the following is the correct sequence of events...
1. A factory uses the sequential method to allocate support department costs. Job 23 required 50...
1. A factory uses the sequential method to allocate support department costs. Job 23 required 50 machine hours in the Cutting Department and 10 direct labor hours in the Assembly Department. Total direct materials cost was $1,500, and total direct labor cost was $200. If the overhead rate of the Cutting Department is $4.5 per machine hour and the Assembly Department is $5.5 per direct labor hour, calculate the cost of Job 23. a. $2,000 b. $1,700 c. $1,980 d....
Sasha Company allocates the estimated $195,600 of its accounting department costs to its production and sales...
Sasha Company allocates the estimated $195,600 of its accounting department costs to its production and sales departments since the accounting department supports the other two departments particularly with regard to payroll and accounts payable functions. The costs will be allocated based on the number of employees using the direct method. Information regarding costs and employees follows: Department: Accounting Employees: 4 Department: Production Employees: 26 Department: Sales Employees: 14 How much of the accounting department costs will be allocated to the...
1. Carolina Corporation has two production Departments: P1 and P2 and two service departments: S1 and...
1. Carolina Corporation has two production Departments: P1 and P2 and two service departments: S1 and S2. Direct costs for each department and the proportion of service costs used by the various departments for the month of July are as follows:    Proportion of Services Used by: Department Direct costs S1 S2 P1 P2 S1 $ 72,000 0.70 0.10 0.20 S2 $ 157,000 0.20 0.30 0.50 P1 $ 214,000 P2 $ 179,000 Under the direct-method of cost allocation, the amount...
Allocating Joint Costs Using the Net Realizable Value Method A company manufactures three products, L-Ten, Triol,...
Allocating Joint Costs Using the Net Realizable Value Method A company manufactures three products, L-Ten, Triol, and Pioze, from a joint process. Each production run costs $12,000. None of the products can be sold at split-off, but must be processed further. Information on one batch of the three products is as follows: Product         Gallons Further Processing Cost per Gallon Eventual Market Price per Gallon L-Ten         3,000 $0.60   $2.20   Triol         3,500 0.90 4.90 Pioze         2,200 1.60 6.90...
The following information relates to a joint production process for three products, with a total joint...
The following information relates to a joint production process for three products, with a total joint production cost of $105,000. There are no separable processing costs for any of the three products. Product Sales Value at Split-Off Units at Split-Off 1 $ 126,000 200     2 52,500 600 3 31,500 1,200 $ 210,000 2,000 What percentage of joint cost is allocated to each of the three products using the physical units method? Product Percent of Sales Units 1% 2% 3%
Christiansen Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to...
Christiansen Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to $450,000 in the production of 20,000 gallons of W and 50,000 gallons of X. Both products will be processed beyond the split-off point, giving rise to the following data:    W X   Separable processing costs $40,000 $160,000   Sales price (per gallon) if processed beyond split-of $15 $13 The joint cost allocated to X under the net-realizable-value method would be: (Do not round your intermediate...
Christiansen Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to...
Christiansen Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to $450,000 in the production of 20,000 gallons of W and 50,000 gallons of X. Both products will be processed beyond the split-off point, giving rise to the following data:    W X   Separable processing costs $40,000 $160,000   Sales price (per gallon) if processed beyond split-of $15 $13 The joint cost allocated to W under the net-realizable-value method would be: (Do not round your intermediate...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT